Electricity Supply in the Baltic Region after the Phasing out of Ignalina NPP

Practical information
Dans le cadre de l'Ifri Energy Breakfast Roundtable, un séminaire avec Maksim Kozlov, Head of Baltic NPP Project, Interrao UES, Wladyslaw Mielczarski, European Coordinator for the Northern European Power Link, Professor in Power Engineering, Technical University of Lodz, Poland, Zygimantas Vaiciunas, Head of Strategic Planning Division, Ministry for Energy of the Republic of Lithuania, Monica Eordoghne Zsigri, Policy Coodinator, Energy Policy & Security Supply, DG Tren, European Commission.
The last working reactor of the Ignalina power plant, which had two 1 500 MW reactors of the Chernobyl RBMK type, will be closed down by the end of 2009, in compliance with the EU accession treaty of Lithuania. The Baltic States, Belarus, the Kaliningrad territory and also Russia have been supplied with electricity from Ignalina ever since 1984. Ignalina hence was at the centre of the regions's electricity supply.
One should note in this context that the EU member states Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia have never been electrically synchronized with the Western UCTE or the Scandinavian Nordel - they still remain in the Eastern electricity system IPS/UPS.
What are the supply scenarios after the phasing out ? Two projects are the most prominent in today's debate : a new reactor in the Russian Kaliningrad enclave, and a new reactor in Visaginas, next to Ignalina, built by Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland. Both of them want to dominate the regional electricity market after the closure of Ignalina, but the Russian project also focusses on the Western market, via for example a DC link from Russia to Germany through the Baltic Sea.
Moreover, Poland plans to build nuclear reactors on its own.
This Ifri Energy Breakfast gathers experts on the issue and will identify the most likely options as well as their impact on regional geopolitics and energy supply.
Other events

The Future of Space Cooperation: Challenges and Opportunities in the Trump II Era
The policy orientations of the Trump II administration profoundly challenge the foundations of international cooperation in space science and exploration. This shift reflects a broader trend of strategic disengagement and weakening of multilateral mechanisms in the space domain.

Strategic Autonomy and Asia amid Rising Geoeconomic Competition
Amid growing strategic and geopolitical uncertainty, Europe is grappling with the notion of its strategic autonomy. For Europe’s partners in Asia, the concept is also becoming increasingly salient as the world enters an era of structural transformation.

France-Germany, The Engine Under Pressure
Faced with a profoundly disrupted strategic and economic environment, Franco-German cooperation is more than ever the central pillar of Europe's future. The war in Ukraine, energy and technological dependence, and uncertainty about the strength of the transatlantic ties require urgent deepening of European sovereignty, both in terms of defence and economic and industrial competitiveness.