Anglo-French dialogue - "Co-Development: What Objectives? What Principles?"
Practical information
Second Meeting of the Anglo-French Policy Dialogue on Regularisation and Co-Development: "Co-Development: What Objectives? What Principles?"
Project directed by Christophe Bertossi (Ifri, 'Migrations, Identities, Citizenship' Programme) in partnership with the Barrow Cadbury Trust.
With irregular migration, co-development involves another important aspect of the future of a European migration policy, namely its international dimension, and the idea that any progressive migration policy must benefit both sending and receiving countries.
First, it is a matter of limiting the costs ("brain drain") and increasing the benefits (migrants' remittances) of immigration for the countries of origin. The idea is that immigration to Europe must not be organised by EU States at the expense of sending countries. This principle is also partially an outcome of the security-based approach to immigration: a more effective control of the EU external borders and a less important migratory pressure on these borders would result from the co-operation between EU countries and the countries of origin. The "Global Approach" confirmed at the Rabat Conference (2006) is clearly framed by this security rationale.
Second - and in an even more ambiguous way - co-development is based on the assumption that development and migration are deeply intertwined. The rationale behind co-development is that the development of the countries of origin will decrease the perceived migratory pressure on the EU borders. This must be questioned for two reasons. On the one hand, more economic development in these countries will not stop emigration, but only transform the profile of migrants engaged in migration. On the other hand, it is far from certain that migrants work for the development of their countries of origin. Certainly, they contribute to a circulation of skills and remittances, but the project of emigration is primarily an individual and family one. When these remittances reach the country of origin, they do not necessarily become an investment that produces sustainable development.
Third, another aspect of co-development policies consists in proposing financial incentives for migrants to return to their countries of origin, and start businesses or work there. The problem is that the success of voluntary return schemes in the past decades is highly disputed. France experimented with such schemes in the 1970s with mixed results.
Speakers
Our team
Christophe BERTOSSI
Ancien directeur du Centre migrations et citoyennetés de l'Ifri
External contributor(s)
Vincent THOUVENIN
Other events
Brussels, Germany, France and Italy Facing the Energy and Industrial Crises: Coordinated or Diverging Trajectories?
Amidst soaring defense spending, higher borrowing costs, erosion of energy intensive industries, renewed energy price hikes and possibly physical shortages, the European Union and its Member States are again struggling to stabilize the European economies. Governments are tempted by uncoordinated, short-term moves while in Brussels, there is a struggle between the “more of the same” and the “scrap it largely” approaches to the transition.
Geopolitical stakes of the New Moon race
As the United States, China, and India solidify their lunar ambitions, Europe is still seeking to define its stance: should it be a reliable partner or an autonomous strategic player? This conference will examine the stakes of this new race to the Moon and Europe’s interest in asserting itself as a lunar power through partnerships, industrial ambitions, and whether its participation in the new lunar race serves as a lever for strategic autonomy and internal cohesion, or an illustration of its dependence.