Global Governance of Migration: A Challenge Beyond the North-South Paradigm
Practical information
The global dialogue on migration is frequently stalled due to contradictory interests and positions between the countries of the North (Europe and North America) and the South.
However, these positions do not take into account changes in migration profiles of countries, which can be departure, transit and receiving countries. Can multilateralism break with the North-South paradigm? Moreover, what is the added value of non-state actors (diaspora, NGOs, companies) or infra-state actors (local authorities) in the global governance of migration?
Chair
Bouchra Rahmouni, Senior Fellow, OCP Policy Center
Speakers
Matthieu Tardis, Research Fellow for the Center for Migration and Citizenship, Ifri
Khalid Zerouali, Head of the Migration and Border Surveillance Directorate, Moroccan Interior Ministry
Thierno Camara, Chairman, Forum des Organisations de Solidarité Internationale issues des Migrations (FORIM)
Mohammed Loulichki, Senior Fellow, OCP Policy Center; Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva and New York
Related Subjects
Other events
Brussels, Germany, France and Italy Facing the Energy and Industrial Crises: Coordinated or Diverging Trajectories?
Amidst soaring defense spending, higher borrowing costs, erosion of energy intensive industries, renewed energy price hikes and possibly physical shortages, the European Union and its Member States are again struggling to stabilize the European economies. Governments are tempted by uncoordinated, short-term moves while in Brussels, there is a struggle between the “more of the same” and the “scrap it largely” approaches to the transition.
Geopolitical stakes of the New Moon race
As the United States, China, and India solidify their lunar ambitions, Europe is still seeking to define its stance: should it be a reliable partner or an autonomous strategic player? This conference will examine the stakes of this new race to the Moon and Europe’s interest in asserting itself as a lunar power through partnerships, industrial ambitions, and whether its participation in the new lunar race serves as a lever for strategic autonomy and internal cohesion, or an illustration of its dependence.