Practical information
The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the risks of an excessive dependence on one single economic partner.

It has prompted a rethinking of what economic security really entails. There is a realization that supply chains need to be more diversified and more resilient. Economic and industrial strategic autonomy is now a key concern for the major economic players, including Japan, France and other European countries. However, achieving this objective is not without challenges. On the other hand, some countries in Southeast Asia will likely benefit from a diversification away from China. Ensuring economic security also implies adequately protecting key industrial assets against predatory moves. Several key players, including Japan and the EU have taken measures to that end. This event will explore the various impacts of the COVID-19 crisis on the economic security of Asian and European countries.
This webinar will be held in English.
Programme
Following a brief set of remarks by each speaker, the discussion will be interactive and led by the Chair. Q/A with the audience will be included in the discussion.
Main questions discussed:
- How did the COVID-19 crisis impact the industrial policy of key international players?
- What are the implications of the COVID-19 crisis on the supply chains in Asia and beyond?
- What is the position of the EU and France?
- How to regulate access to key market and key industrial assets?
- What role for multilateralism?
Chair and discussion leader: Françoise NICOLAS, Director, Center for Asian Studies, Ifri
- The COVID-19 crisis and the risks over the supply chain: an assessment
Thibaud MOULIN, Associé, KYU
- Japan’s perspective on economic security in the COVID era
Shin OYA, Senior Consulting Fellow, Asia Pacific Initiative, Tokyo; Chief Representative for Strategic Research, JBIC, Japan
- The reorganization of the Global Value Chains and Southeast Asian countries
Lurong CHEN, Senior Economist, ERIA, Jakarta
Related Subjects
Other events

Cracking the dilemma of international carbon credits in the EU 2040 target: can EU’s climate action turn geopolitical without losing domestic integrity?
With COP30 just around the corner, and as the EU is debating its 2035 NDC and 2040 targets, EU faces a key strategic dilemma of whether international carbon credits should be included in its 2040 emissions reduction target and if so, under which conditions?

The Evolution of the U.S. Strategic Posture under Trump's Second Term
The United States’ strategic posture is currently marked by significant uncertainty and contradictory signals.