Algeria: Cosmetic Change or Actual Reform?
Algeria has emerged as something of an “exception” across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, and while the recent elections have been marred by widespread allegations of fraud, the results have effectively consolidated the regime’s grip on power thus ensuring its complete monopoly over the country’s reform process.
Spared from the revolutionary waves that enveloped much of the MENA region since early 2011, the Algerian government has gone to great lengths to promote an image of the country as an ‘island of stability’ in a region experiencing deep social and political change. Meant primarily for international consumption, the latest manifestation of this trend is given by the country’s recent parliamentary elections held on May 10, 2012. Hailed by the government as Algeria’s “freest ever”, the vote was meant to restore a semblance of popular legitimacy to the political process given that the new parliament is expected to enact a series of constitutional reforms promised by the executive in April 2011. Described as a “test of the country’s credibility”2 by Algerian president Abdelaziz Bouteflika, the election results confounded many as the country’s ruling party garnered a solid majority of seats in Algeria’s parliament thus bucking a region-wide trend that saw Islamist parties win elections across North Africa since the advent of the Arab Spring. In light of these events Algeria has emerged as something of an ‘exception’ across the MENA region, and while the recent elections have been marred by widespread allegations of fraud, the results have effectively consolidated the regime’s grip on power thus ensuring its complete monopoly over the country’s reform process. Bouteflika’s much vaunted promises of reform, unveiled in the wake of the Arab Spring and ostensibly aimed at “strengthening democracy” in the country, have been described by many within Algeria as yet another ploy designed to ensure regime continuity while giving the international community the perception that the government is engaging in a gradual process of political reform. Algeria’s opposition parties, many of which have challenged the election results and subsequently boycotted the opening session of parliament, hold that these reforms will at best result in a series of cosmetic changes that cannot hope to challenge the entrenched interests of those political and military elites who have governed Algeria – often from behind the scenes – since 1962.
Over a year since the outbreak of the Arab Spring, the government’s promises of political reform have yet to be implemented by Algeria’s ruling elites. While stability has thus far prevailed, Algeria’s profound imbalances in the social, political and economic realms seriously call into question the future sustainability of the Algerian regime. By analyzing the Algerian government’s promises of reform and the country’s recent parliamentary elections, the following research address the thesis of a so-called ‘Algerian exception’ and casts doubt over the regime’s genuine intentions for reform.
Available in:
Regions and themes
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Algeria: Cosmetic Change or Actual Reform?
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesEscalation within Continuity: Spain’s Foreign Policy towards Israel and Palestine after October 7th
Over the past two years, Spain has emerged as one of the most vocal countries in supporting the Palestinian cause. While Madrid initially aligned with the prevailing European position, recognizing Israel’s right to self-defense after the 7 October attacks, it soon distinguished itself from most European Union (EU) Member States by questioning and later condemning Israel’s conduct of war in Gaza.
Australia’s Recognition of Palestine: A Case of Supporting the Status Quo over Accountability
Hamas’s terrorist attacks against Israel on October 7, 2023, killed over a thousand Israelis, altering irrevocably the way the Palestinian/Israeli conflict is viewed internationally. Australia’s government professed profound shock and disgust at Hamas’s attacks, together with its unwavering diplomatic and political support for Israel. But as Israel’s response became more concerned with exacting revenge and as the pretext to fulfill long-held ideological dreams of a Greater Israel, support from Australia became more muted and conditional. This culminated in Australia joining Britain, France, and Canada in formally recognizing a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly meeting in September 2025.
Russia, the Palestinians and Gaza: Adjustments after October 7th
The Soviet Union (USSR), and subsequently the Russian Federation as its internationally recognized legal successor, has consistently sought to play a visible role in efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Canada’s Recognition of a Palestinian State: What Consequences on its Foreign Policy Toward Palestine?
On September 21, 2025, Canada became the 148th of 157 countries to recognize Palestine as a state. It did this with the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia, defying the United States (US) and Israeli opposition.