The need for a strategic recycling approach to take up the challenge of critical metals
 
In September 2010, China stopped all exports of rare earths and associated products to Japan, depriving Japan’s industry of essential raw materials. This decision highlighted the tensions around the trade of critical materials and China’s monopoly on a group of particular metals. Western countries had already taken some initiatives so as to reduce, or at least to analyse their vulnerabilities in the segment of critical materials.
 
As early as 2008, the European Commission developed the initiative for critical materials (Raw Materials Initiative), which is based on three pillars: the sustainable and legal production of mineral raw materials, the control of European Union supply routes and a strategy of resource efficiency through recycling. It has also led to the preparation and adoption of a list of critical materials.
This brief is available in French only: Face au défi des métaux critiques, une approche stratégique du recyclage s’impose
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesBrazil One Year Away from the October 2026 General Elections
Brazil’s general elections will be held on October 4, 2026, to elect the president, vice-president, members of the National Congress, governors, deputy governors and state legislative assemblies. For the presidential and gubernatorial elections, a second round will be held on October 25 if no candidate obtains a majority of the votes in the first round.
COP30: An Inflection Point for Climate Action and Governance
The 30th Conference of the Parties (COP30), opening in Belém, Brazil, on November 10th 2025, convenes at a perilous moment.
The Strategic Dimension of Skills in the Clean Industrial Deal
In the competitiveness and energy transition battles, the European Union (EU) must master a determinant factor: skills.
The Energy Transition Faces Geopolitical Challenges. How Can Ideological Divides Be Overcome?
President Trump’s positions and policies, combined with record coal consumption and booming global electricity demand, geo-economic confrontation, and widespread concerns about energy security, are changing the game when it comes to understanding realistic decarbonization trajectories. The war in Europe is intensifying competition between defense and transition budgets. This is also the case elsewhere in the world.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                 
 
 
 
