The European Union in Competition with the United States and China. How to Balance Free Trade, Competitiveness and Economic Security?
Practical information
Accessibility
Themes and regions
Related centers and programs
As the geopolitical context has changed, so has the approach to international economic relations and the rules-based multilateral framework. Covid and Russia’s war against Ukraine have exposed the risks of extended supply chains and of having become dependent on a single supplier.
China’s lack of reciprocity in market access and its mercantilist state capitalism have led to a backlash in the United States. An already weakened WTO was hardly an obstacle to impose tariffs and offer massive subsidies to stay ahead in the race for technological leadership and advance the green transition through preferential treatment for US industry. The prospect of a new Trump administration confronts the European Union with additional challenges.
Why has Europe fallen so far behind in the global competition in advanced technologies? It has expanded its toolbox to defend itself against unfair competition and adopted an economic security strategy for strengthening competitiveness and mitigating risks. But is the flouting of the rules for fair trade and competition by others the main reason for Europe’s deteriorating productivity and competitiveness rather than its own policy failure ? And would the EU actually want or be able to copy the Chinese or US recipes of massive state support or deep capital markets with huge pools of venture capital ? What would be the risks for distorting competition and the internal market ? At the start of the new Commission the EU needs to address these issues to cope with the challenges arising from policies pursued by US, China and Russia.
Opening
Dominique David, President of the Austro-French Centre for Rapprochement in Europe, Advisor to the Executive Chairman of the French Institute of International Relations, Paris
Discussion
Thomas Wieser, Non-resident fellow, Bruegel, Brussels, former Chairman of Eurogroup working group
Natacha Valla, Member of the Board of Director, Institut Montaigne, Dean of Sciences Po’s School of Management and Innovation, Paris
Elvire Fabry, Senior Research Fellow, Jacques Delors Institute, Paris
Malorie Schaus, Research Fellow, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels
Chair: Dietmar Schweisgut, Secretary General of the Austro-French Centre for Rapprochement in Europe
Replay
Our partners
Speakers
Our team
Dominique DAVID
Chair of the Austro-French Centre for Rapprochement in Europe (ÖFZ), Advisor to the Executive Chairman, Editor-in-chief of Politique étrangère and co-Director of Ramses
Related Subjects
Other events
France-Germany, The Engine Under Pressure
Annual Conference of The Study Committe on Franco-German Relations (Cerfa) ─ Faced with a profoundly disrupted strategic and economic environment, Franco-German cooperation is more than ever the central pillar of Europe's future. The war in Ukraine, energy and technological dependence, and uncertainty about the strength of the transatlantic ties require urgent deepening of European sovereignty, both in terms of defence and economic and industrial competitiveness.
European Strategic Autonomy or New Dependence? Russian Gas, Transatlantic Pressures, and the Green Deal
European energy policy sits at the fault line of geopolitical conflict, climate obligations, and transatlantic bargaining. While Hungary, Slovakia and others remain heavily reliant on Russian gas, the EU has sought to harden its stance through sanctions -most recently with Ursula von der Leyen’s announcement of a ban on Russian LNG imports in the 19th package.
The New Nuclear Instabilities on the Korean Peninsula
From the growing size and diversification of the North Korean nuclear arsenal, and an open rhetoric in favor of nuclear proliferation in the South because of the loss of credibility of U.S. extended deterrence, the Peninsula is facing raising nuclear tensions.