The European Union in Competition with the United States and China. How to Balance Free Trade, Competitiveness and Economic Security?
Practical information
Accessibility
Themes and regions
Related centers and programs
As the geopolitical context has changed, so has the approach to international economic relations and the rules-based multilateral framework. Covid and Russia’s war against Ukraine have exposed the risks of extended supply chains and of having become dependent on a single supplier.
China’s lack of reciprocity in market access and its mercantilist state capitalism have led to a backlash in the United States. An already weakened WTO was hardly an obstacle to impose tariffs and offer massive subsidies to stay ahead in the race for technological leadership and advance the green transition through preferential treatment for US industry. The prospect of a new Trump administration confronts the European Union with additional challenges.
Why has Europe fallen so far behind in the global competition in advanced technologies? It has expanded its toolbox to defend itself against unfair competition and adopted an economic security strategy for strengthening competitiveness and mitigating risks. But is the flouting of the rules for fair trade and competition by others the main reason for Europe’s deteriorating productivity and competitiveness rather than its own policy failure ? And would the EU actually want or be able to copy the Chinese or US recipes of massive state support or deep capital markets with huge pools of venture capital ? What would be the risks for distorting competition and the internal market ? At the start of the new Commission the EU needs to address these issues to cope with the challenges arising from policies pursued by US, China and Russia.
Opening
Dominique David, President of the Austro-French Centre for Rapprochement in Europe, Advisor to the Executive Chairman of the French Institute of International Relations, Paris
Discussion
Thomas Wieser, Non-resident fellow, Bruegel, Brussels, former Chairman of Eurogroup working group
Natacha Valla, Member of the Board of Director, Institut Montaigne, Dean of Sciences Po’s School of Management and Innovation, Paris
Elvire Fabry, Senior Research Fellow, Jacques Delors Institute, Paris
Malorie Schaus, Research Fellow, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels
Chair: Dietmar Schweisgut, Secretary General of the Austro-French Centre for Rapprochement in Europe
Replay
Our partners
Speakers
Our team
Dominique DAVID
Chair of the Austro-French Centre for Rapprochement in Europe (ÖFZ), Advisor to the Executive Chairman, Editor-in-chief of Politique étrangère and co-Director of Ramses
Related Subjects
Other events
Brussels, Germany, France and Italy Facing the Energy and Industrial Crises: Coordinated or Diverging Trajectories?
Amidst soaring defense spending, higher borrowing costs, erosion of energy intensive industries, renewed energy price hikes and possibly physical shortages, the European Union and its Member States are again struggling to stabilize the European economies. Governments are tempted by uncoordinated, short-term moves while in Brussels, there is a struggle between the “more of the same” and the “scrap it largely” approaches to the transition.
Managing nuclear escalation: what's in intrawar deterrence?
Since the return of high-intensity warfare in Europe and the rise of strategic tensions in the Indo-Pacific, the issue of managing escalation between nuclear powers has taken center stage in U.S. strategic thinking and, to a lesser extent, in the European one.
Geopolitical stakes of the New Moon race
As the United States, China, and India solidify their lunar ambitions, Europe is still seeking to define its stance: should it be a reliable partner or an autonomous strategic player? This conference will examine the stakes of this new race to the Moon and Europe’s interest in asserting itself as a lunar power through partnerships, industrial ambitions, and whether its participation in the new lunar race serves as a lever for strategic autonomy and internal cohesion, or an illustration of its dependence.