Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea: What are the Risks of Conflict?
Practical information
This seminar is organized around Ralf Emmers, Associate Professor and Coordinator of the Multilateralism and Regionalism Programme, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Singapore. Among his latest publications are: Geopolitics and Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia, London: Routledge, 2009. (with Sam Bateman) (eds), Security and International Politics in the South China Sea: Towards a Co-operative Management Regime, London: Routledge, 2009.
Chair: Françoise Nicolas, Director, Center for Asian Studies Ifri.
The seminar will be held in English.
The presentation will focus on the changing distribution of power in the South China Sea and assess the implications this has for conflict management and avoidance in the disputed areas. There is a growing asymmetry of naval power in the South China Sea to the advantage of China. Southeast Asian claimants are concerned about the rapidly changing power distribution and fear that overwhelming naval capabilities could one day be used by the People's Republic of China to resolve the sovereignty question militarily. The presentation will therefore examine how the Southeast Asian nations have sought, with some success, to manage the unequal power distribution in the South China Sea through the activities of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and its model of conflict management and avoidance. It will assess the risks of conflict in the short to medium term and offer a way forward.
Speakers
Our team
External contributor(s)
Ralf EMMERS
Other events
Brussels, Germany, France and Italy Facing the Energy and Industrial Crises: Coordinated or Diverging Trajectories?
Amidst soaring defense spending, higher borrowing costs, erosion of energy intensive industries, renewed energy price hikes and possibly physical shortages, the European Union and its Member States are again struggling to stabilize the European economies. Governments are tempted by uncoordinated, short-term moves while in Brussels, there is a struggle between the “more of the same” and the “scrap it largely” approaches to the transition.
Geopolitical stakes of the New Moon race
As the United States, China, and India solidify their lunar ambitions, Europe is still seeking to define its stance: should it be a reliable partner or an autonomous strategic player? This conference will examine the stakes of this new race to the Moon and Europe’s interest in asserting itself as a lunar power through partnerships, industrial ambitions, and whether its participation in the new lunar race serves as a lever for strategic autonomy and internal cohesion, or an illustration of its dependence.