The Development of Road Networks in China: Miscalculations and Inequalities
China has some of the densest road networks of any developing country, accounting for the vast majority of paved roads among lower- and middle-income countries. However, statistical data at the national and provincial levels show two puzzling trends.
First, growth in the length of highways has tapered off since 2003 despite policy shocks designed to produce the contrary effect. This trend applies to Eastern, Central, and Western China as the three differentiated regions in transport policy. Second, while lower-class roads have been shown to consistently deliver the greatest positive impact in rural areas, Central and Western China continue to emphasize higher-class roads despite their urgent anti-poverty and market networking needs.
Focusing on the processes of highway project formulation, approval, and financing, the author postulates that fiscal federalist institutions have strongly shaped the motivations of provincial leaders and bureaucrats as the key political entrepreneurs in bargaining over competing priorities and funding options. He argues that three variables - fiscal shortfall, procedural biases, and quality of private capital participation - account for the provincial officials' discriminating against different forms of financing and grades of roads. These variables suggest that inland provinces with fiscal inadequacy and poor quality private capital have perverse incentives to maximize their fiscal base and private rents by focusing resources on higher-class toll roads.
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
The Development of Road Networks in China: Miscalculations and Inequalities
Center for Asian Studies
Asia is a nerve center for multiple global economic, political and security challenges. The Center for Asian Studies provides documented expertise and a platform for discussion on Asian issues to accompany decision makers and explain and contextualize developments in the region for the sake of a larger public dialogue.
The Center's research is organized along two major axes: relations between Asia's major powers and the rest of the world; and internal economic and social dynamics of Asian countries. The Center's research focuses primarily on China, Japan, India, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific, but also covers Southeast Asia, the Korean peninsula and the Pacific Islands.
The Centre for Asian Studies maintains close institutional links with counterpart research institutes in Europe and Asia, and its researchers regularly carry out fieldwork in the region.
The Center organizes closed-door roundtables, expert-level seminars and a number of public events, including an Annual Conference, that welcome experts from Asia, Europe and the United States. The work of Center’s researchers, as well as that of their partners, is regularly published in the Center’s electronic journal Asie.Visions.
Japan’s Energy Policy after Hormuz. Security, Competitiveness, and Decarbonization
The 2026 Hormuz crisis has strengthened rather than weakened the rationale for Japan’s decarbonization strategy, contrary to what might have been expected. Rather than energy policy supplanting climate policy, the two should actually be viewed as inseparable.
Japan and Nuclear Weapons: Between Extended Deterrence and Normative Dilemmas
Since the late 1950s, Japan’s nuclear weapons policy has been based on the coexistence of two competing normative rationales: the rejection of nuclear weapons, rooted in the legacy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the recognition of the central role of US extended nuclear deterrence for Japan’s security.
Japan’s Defense Industry Goes Global: Ambitions and Challenges
Fragmented Europe: Dealing with China as a technology and innovation power
How is Europe navigating China’s ascension as a technological power? The latest report by the European Think-tank Network on China (ETNC) provides a nuanced account of a converging, yet still fragmented approach across 22 countries.