Mid-term Elections in the Philippines: The Clan War Reaches New Heights
Three years after the last general and presidential elections, Filipino voters once again went to the polls on May 12, 2025, to elect their municipal and parliamentary representatives.
While more than 18,000 positions were at stake at all levels of government, it was the senatorial election – 12 out of 24 positions were up for grabs – that attracted most of the political and media attention. The upper house plays a strategic role in determining the partisan balance in the run-up to the 2028 presidential elections.
The Philippine political system is dominated by dynastic and oligarchic logics, in which power relations between families prevail over ideological cleavages and substantive debates. The two “ruling” families, represented by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. (son of the former dictator of the same name) and Vice President Sara Duterte (daughter of the previous President Rodrigo Duterte), have been in open conflict since the implosion of the opportunistic alliance they formed for the 2022 presidential elections. In this context, the mid-term elections have become a referendum in disguise for the domination of one camp or the other.
From the very first days of the campaign, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., who enjoys a solid partisan base in Congress but limited popular support, dramatized the electoral stakes by presenting it as a choice between the “dark days” of Rodrigo Duterte’s regime (2016-2022) and the promise of a “new Philippines”, and called on voters to reject his predecessor’s authoritarian and divisive style of government. The latter quickly counter-attacked, denouncing the government’s inability to contain inflation, while accusing the president of being a heroin addict.
The campaign quickly moved into a critical phase following Sara Duterte’s impeachment vote on February 7 in the House of Representatives, which will have to be confirmed by the Senate, followed by Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest on March 11 and extradition to The Hague, where he now awaits trial on charges of crimes against humanity, committed as part of his war on drugs.
The presidential administration has presented a list of 12 senatorial candidates, united under the banner of the Alyansa Para sa Bagong Pilipinas (Alliance for a New Philippines). Formed in May 2024 with a view to the 2025 elections, this alliance brings together Marcos’ Partido Federal ng Pilipinas and Romualdez’s Lakas-Christian Muslim Democrats (Lakas-CMD), as well as three other parties also controlled by powerful political dynasties. Alyansa thus brings together the country’s dominant forces, and at the start of the campaign, it established itself as a hegemonic player on the Philippine political landscape.
In opposition, the Duterte clan has put forward a senatorial list of ten candidates, the “Duter10”, including two pillars of the former regime: Bong Go, Rodrigo Duterte’s close advisor and right-hand man, and Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa, a central figure in the repressive apparatus during the war on drugs.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Mid-term Elections in the Philippines: The Clan War Reaches New Heights
Juliette LOESCH
Associate Research Fellow, Center for Asian Studies, Ifri
Center for Asian Studies
Asia is a nerve center for multiple global economic, political and security challenges. The Center for Asian Studies provides documented expertise and a platform for discussion on Asian issues to accompany decision makers and explain and contextualize developments in the region for the sake of a larger public dialogue.
The Center's research is organized along two major axes: relations between Asia's major powers and the rest of the world; and internal economic and social dynamics of Asian countries. The Center's research focuses primarily on China, Japan, India, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific, but also covers Southeast Asia, the Korean peninsula and the Pacific Islands.
The Centre for Asian Studies maintains close institutional links with counterpart research institutes in Europe and Asia, and its researchers regularly carry out fieldwork in the region.
The Center organizes closed-door roundtables, expert-level seminars and a number of public events, including an Annual Conference, that welcome experts from Asia, Europe and the United States. The work of Center’s researchers, as well as that of their partners, is regularly published in the Center’s electronic journal Asie.Visions.
Japan’s Energy Policy after Hormuz. Security, Competitiveness, and Decarbonization
The 2026 Hormuz crisis has strengthened rather than weakened the rationale for Japan’s decarbonization strategy, contrary to what might have been expected. Rather than energy policy supplanting climate policy, the two should actually be viewed as inseparable.
Japan and Nuclear Weapons: Between Extended Deterrence and Normative Dilemmas
Since the late 1950s, Japan’s nuclear weapons policy has been based on the coexistence of two competing normative rationales: the rejection of nuclear weapons, rooted in the legacy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the recognition of the central role of US extended nuclear deterrence for Japan’s security.
Japan’s Defense Industry Goes Global: Ambitions and Challenges
Fragmented Europe: Dealing with China as a technology and innovation power
How is Europe navigating China’s ascension as a technological power? The latest report by the European Think-tank Network on China (ETNC) provides a nuanced account of a converging, yet still fragmented approach across 22 countries.