Search on Ifri.org

Frequent searches

Suggestions

What Role for the EU in Doha?

Editorials
|
Date de publication
|
Référence taxonomie collections
Édito Énergie
Image de couverture de la publication
What role for the EU in Doha?
Accroche

Historical leader of the fight against climate change, the European Union’s influence declined in Copenhagen. This opened the way to the so-called BASIC countries to show their willingness to become a driving force in the international climate agenda. Interestingly enough, the Copenhagen conference also introduced a welcome shift in the traditional UN separation between developed and non-developed countries.

Corps analyses

If industrialized countries are responsible for most of current GHG emissions, emerging countries are the biggest emitters of tomorrow. However, Cancun conference and a strong pressure from the G77 reverted to the North/South partition. Durban saw a regain of European influence as the EU was key to open the discussions on the extension of the Kyoto protocol up to 2020 and to lay the foundations of long term discussions to pursue international agreements beyond 2020.

Yet according to the recent BASIC countries" joint ministerial statement, the ever present battle over the principle of "common but differentiated responsibility" is far from over. So far, among the major emitting countries, the European Union seems to be the only one to keep pushing for a binding agreement. One can wonder if the European Union has an interest to insist on such an agreement whereas the shortcomings of such an approach have been showcased notably by Canada. The country failed its Kyoto commitments and left the protocol without paying any penalties. Instead, India, a fierce negotiator, and most emerging countries (and of course for obvious reasons US) are aiming to work toward a new non-binding agreement that would take effect in 2020. Furthermore, the EU gave up the implementation of the international aspects of the EU-ETS legislation, postponing the introduction of aviation’s GHG emissions in its cap and trade system by one year. The Climate Commissioner explained this decision as a way to acknowledge the progress being made in negotiations on a global emissions deal. This however also illustrates the EU struggle to export its climate governance model beyond its borders. This kind of unilateral decision has indeed been unpopular very early on with countries such as the US, China and India. Multilateralism is the key when addressing climate change issues. Europe should remember to work on solutions acceptable by third parties.

European decision makers need to take into account Europe’s economic crisis. (1) It is well past time for Europe to put costs as one of the main drivers of its energy system, a notion that seemed to have been forgotten as Europe made the choice of one of the most expensive model. (2) They also have a responsibility with regard to European citizen to protect their industry. In this respect, committing to a 30% reduction by 2030 might be a very dangerous move.

Should Europe aim to remain THE leader or rather settle to be a driving force of climate international negotiations among others? The share of EU GHG emissions in 2020 and beyond is not significant enough to justify that EU assumes more than it can. Instead, EU should join others" efforts to contribute to the establishment of a future agreement and avoid well known deadlocks such as those triggered by “binding targets” in not so ancient discussions.

 

Decoration

Available in:

Share

Decoration
Author(s)
Image principale
Climate & Energy
Center for Energy & Climate
Accroche centre

Ifri's Energy and Climate Center carries out activities and research on the geopolitical and geoeconomic issues of energy transitions such as energy security, competitiveness, control of value chains, and acceptability. Specialized in the study of European energy/climate policies as well as energy markets in Europe and around the world, its work also focuses on the energy and climate strategies of major powers such as the United States, China or India. It offers recognized expertise, enriched by international collaborations and events, particularly in Paris and Brussels.

Image principale

Reconnecting With Europe's Nuclear DNA: a Political Question

Date de publication
10 July 2025
Accroche

As Europe's main source of low-carbon electricity, nuclear power is a strategic asset for tackling climate and geopolitical challenges. 

Image principale

Will the Western Nuclear Power Revival Take Place? The State of Extra-European Advances

Date de publication
10 July 2025
Accroche

Against the dual backdrop of the energy transition and the rapid transformation of the international order, the question of Western nuclear revival is being raised with renewed acuity. 

Image principale

Re-evaluating Copper Supply: The Crucial Role of Technology

Date de publication
18 June 2025
Accroche

Some authors argue that the energy transition is doomed to fail due to metal scarcity and the rising energy costs of extraction. 

Cédric PHILIBERT Nicholas ARNDT
Image principale

The Strategic Dimension of Power System Flexibility: Opportunities in Europe

Date de publication
30 April 2025
Accroche

The European Union has embarked on an energy transition aimed primarily at replacing fossil fuels by electrifying demand. 

Cédric PHILIBERT Arthur de LASSUS

How can this study be cited?

Image de couverture de la publication
What role for the EU in Doha?
What Role for the EU in Doha?, from Ifri by
Copy