Baden-Württemberg under Green Leadership – Balance Sheet of Two Government Periods under Winfried Kretschmann
Baden-Württemberg's economic and social structure offered good starting conditions for center-right parties from the beginning, which the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) initially knew how to use for itself. From 1953 to 2011 the Prime Minister belonged to the CDU. In 2011 the Greens and the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) won an election over the CDU for the first time. Winfried Kretschmann was elected the first Green Prime Minister in a German state.
From 2011 to 2016 he ruled with the SPD in a green-red coalition, and since 2016 the Greens and CDU have formed a green-black coalition.
Right at the beginning of his reign, Kretschmann made a thorough change of style in the relationship between citizenship and politics with his “Politics of Being Heard” and the extensive expansion of citizen participation. In terms of economic policy, he kept the heavily export-oriented industrial country, which is characterized by vehicle and mechanical engineering, on the road to success and prepared it for the ecological structural change. The reform of the electoral law, the realignment of the integration and asylum policy begun under Green-Red, and the nationwide broadband expansion have only progressed gradually.
Personally, Kretschmann quickly gained a high reputation throughout the country, well beyond the green electorate. His pragmatic course of closely combining economy and ecology has the future competitiveness of Baden-Württemberg as a business location in mind and enjoys high approval throughout the state. The green-black coalition can certainly be seen as a model for federal politics.
Ulrich Eith studied political science, mathematics, and sociology, earned his doctorate and habilitation in political science. He is Professor of political science at the University of Freiburg since 2007 and is director of the Wiesneck House of Studies in Buchenbach since 2008 (Studienhaus Wiesneck, Institut für politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg e.V.).
This publication is available the following languages (pdf):
- FRENCH: Le Bade-Wurtemberg sous la direction des Verts – Bilan des deux mandats de Winfried Kretschmann à la tête du Land.
- GERMAN: Baden-Württemberg unter grüner Führung – Bilanz zweier Regierungsperioden unter Winfried Kretschmann.
Author(s)
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programs
The Study Committee on Franco-German Relations (Cerfa)
The Study Committee on Franco-German Relations (Cerfa) was created in 1954 by an inter-governmental agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and France, in order to raise awareness of Germany in France and analyze Franco-German relations, including in their European and international dimensions. In its conferences and seminars, which bring together experts, political leaders, senior decision-makers and representatives of civil society from both countries, Cerfa develops the Franco-German debate and stimulates political proposals. It regularly publishes studies through two collections: Cerfa notes and studies as well as Franco-German visions.
Cerfa maintains close relations with the network of German foundations and think tanks. In addition to its research and debate activities, Cerfa promotes the emergence of a new Franco-German generation through original cooperation programs. This is how in 2021-2022, Cerfa led a program on multilateralism with the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Paris. This program is aimed at young professionals from both countries interested in the issues of multilateralism in the context of their activities. It covered a wide range of themes relating to multilateralism, such as international trade, health, human rights and migration, non-proliferation and disarmament. Previously, Cerfa had participated in the Franco-German future dialogue, co-led with the DGAP from 2007 to 2020, and supported by the Robert Bosch Foundation and the Daniel Vernet group (formerly the Franco-German Reflection Group) which was founded in 2014 upon the initiative of the Genshagen Foundation.
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
France-Germany: Overcoming Differences to Strengthen European Sovereignty
The Franco-German “reset” launched with Friedrich Merz’s appointment as Chancellor in May 2025 and given concrete form at the Franco-German Council of Ministers (FGCM) in Toulon in August 2025 was intended to address the structural challenges affecting the bilateral relationship. Yet it is clear that these ambitions have only been partially translated into concrete action. Since the beginning of 2026, Franco-German relations have entered a phase in which short-term challenges have combined with deeper divergences over priorities, policy approaches, and strategic culture.
Under construction: Europe’s economic repositioning in a fragmented international order
„Under Destruction“– this was this year’s motto at the Munich Security Conference. A motto that applies both to security and economy in an increasingly fragile international system. In 2024, Mario Draghi’s report on the EU’s competitiveness rang the alarm bell: Europe is slipping behind the US and China, European companies struggle with Brussels' bureaucracy, and the internal market is too fragmented. However, two years later only about 15 % of his recommendations were implemented: the wake-up call was not heard.
Germany in the Shadow of the United States, Russia, and China – Systemic Paradigm Shifts
Since reunification, Germany has built its prosperity on an international order based on free trade, multilateralism, and geopolitical stability. This model relied on three relationships considered complementary: U.S. military protection, Russian energy supplies, and economic integration with China. For several decades, Berlin viewed these interdependencies as factors contributing to peace, growth, and security.
France and EU Enlargement: From Strategic Hesitation to a Geopolitical Shift
Paris has come a long way in its approach to enlarging the European Union. However, French support remains fragile, due in part to a lack of public support.