Retours sur Sangaris. Entre stabilisation et protection des civils
In December 2013, France launched its operation Sangaris in the Central African Republic. What conclusions can be drawn for the stabilization of the country and the protection of civilians?
In December 2013, a decade-long political crisis in the Central African Republic descended into an aggravated civil war giving reasons to fear for mass violence along communal lines. In order to prevent further chaos, United Nations mandated France to engage in a military intervention, its seventh in this country since 1960. As a bridging operation, Sangaris aimed at setting the right conditions for the EU and UN peacekeeping missions to provide longer term security and development guidance. More than two years after its start, time has come to assess operation Sangaris’ military effectiveness in the light of the limited means it was allocated. To some extent, the operation showed how lack of resources could be offset by tactical and operational adaptations. Nevertheless, such adjustments are not risk-free and may decrease operational sustainability. The second key issue is the protection of civilians. When resources are limited, “protecting means choosing”, i.e. confronting difficult dilemmas that political and military decision-makers need to be aware of before engaging in such tasks.
This content is available in French: « Retours sur Sangaris. Entre stabilisation et protection des civils ».
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesFury from the Skies. A Strategic Analysis of Air Campaign against Iran
What is the outcome of Operations Roaring Lion (RL) and Epic Fury (EF), launched by Israel and the United States against the Islamic Republic of Iran on February 28, 2026?
Finland: The Ally Who Came in from the Cold
Among all European countries, Finland is perhaps the one whose strategic culture and military model have changed the least since the end of the Cold War. Built after the end of the Second World War to deter a potential new Soviet invasion, this model enabled Finland to serve as an example of European rearmament.
Stability under Pressure. A Pakistani View on Nuclear Deterrence after Pahalgam
The May 2025 India-Pakistan crisis after the Pahalgam attack has generated a familiar but incomplete debate: did nuclear deterrence work, or did it merely allow both sides to fight a limited war under the nuclear shadow? The better answer is that deterrence worked at the level at which it was designed to work. It prevented a general war and an uncontrolled vertical escalation, and kept nuclear weapons in the background. But it did not prevent India from attempting to carve out space for conventional action, nor did it prevent Pakistan from responding conventionally to restore deterrence credibility.