Practical information
Assessing the state of democracy in Asia is a challenge. While some countries, such as Japan and India, have been showing the way from early days, some others, such as in Southeast Asia are still struggling to ensure stable and sustainable democratic institutions and practices.
Several competing visions and approaches to democracy also coexist in Asia. The case of Hong Kong exemplifies the tensions and frictions between vibrant calls for liberal democracy and pushes to promote a more authoritarian political system. Finally, the discussion will also involve the European model of democracy and the potential role for influencing Asian good practices.
PROGRAMME
9:30-11:30: Asian democracy: models, experiences and challenges
Chair: Françoise Nicolas, Director, Center for Asian Studies, Ifri
- The Japanese democratic model: experience and responsibility for the future,
Kaoru Iokibe, University of Tokyo - The Chinese culture and democracy: The Hong Kong experience between Beijing and Taipei,
Steve Tsang, Director, SOAS China Institute, SOAS University of London - Progresses and Challenges to Democracy in Southeast Asia,
Sophie Boisseau du Rocher, Associate Research Fellow, Ifri - Indian democracy and legacy for the region,
Zorawar Daulet Singh, CPR, New Delhi
Discussants:
- Ken Endo, Hokkaido University
- Alice Ekman, Head of China research, Center for Asian Studies, Ifri
Q/A Session
11:30-12:00- Concluding Remarks: The European model and the democracy in Asia
- Richard Youngs, Carnegie Europe
Other events
Role of Intelligence for Political Decision Making
As part of the intelligence-focused BBS, organized in partnership with the Intelligence College in Europe, Ifri welcomes Mr. Philipp Wolff, Coordinator of the German Federal Intelligence services at the Federal Chancellery.
Nuclear Sharing in Europe: A Contested Policy That Endures
Since the end of the Cold War, the number of US nuclear weapons stationed in Europe has fallen more than seventy-fold, yet their presence in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey remains a quiet pillar of NATO's deterrence posture. This "nuclear sharing" arrangement, central to the Alliance since its founding, has long been contested by public opinion, political parties, and civil society across Europe, without ever being abandoned by host governments. This paradox lies at the heart of the seminar: why does such an unpopular policy persist?