RAMSES 2024. A World to Be Remade
For its 42nd edition, RAMSES 2024 identifies three major challenges for 2024.
What the war is telling us: The war in Ukraine is upsetting the internal and institutional balances of the European continent: what form will the European Union or the Atlantic Alliance take in the future? More broadly, it calls into question the stability of its geopolitical margins, around Russia and with the emergence of new players.
India: the unknown emergence. Perhaps India embodies the new world: with its multi-azimuth diplomacy, its nationalist temptation, its economic emergence, its demographic weight and its ambitions to reform multilateral forums. New Delhi: a player to be reckoned with in shaping tomorrow's world.
Drafts of a new world: Economic interdependence is becoming a weapon, as are technological dynamics and ideological discourse. What major factors will shape tomorrow's world? Beyond the assertion of national interests, is it possible to imagine a collective and united construction?
Available in:
Regions and themes
ISBN / ISSN
Share
China and Trade in Critical Raw Materials (CRMs)
Critical raw materials (CRMs) have become central features of a new dynamic in global power politics, with China now wielding considerable leverage. Amid rising regional and global uncertainty, resource security is back in the spotlight as a key determinant of sovereignty and national security for Europe, its allies and its partners. The very survival of key, even vital industries, from automotive to aerospace to health to energy to defense, is at stake.
Japan’s Energy Policy after Hormuz. Security, Competitiveness, and Decarbonization
The 2026 Hormuz crisis has strengthened rather than weakened the rationale for Japan’s decarbonization strategy, contrary to what might have been expected. Rather than energy policy supplanting climate policy, the two should actually be viewed as inseparable.
Japan and Nuclear Weapons: Between Extended Deterrence and Normative Dilemmas
Since the late 1950s, Japan’s nuclear weapons policy has been based on the coexistence of two competing normative rationales: the rejection of nuclear weapons, rooted in the legacy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the recognition of the central role of US extended nuclear deterrence for Japan’s security.