More flexibility: What does the UK want and what could the others accept?
Practical information
The United Kingdom is undergoing an important debate vis-à-vis its membership to the European Union. Domestic in essence, this debate however needs to be better appreciated across Europe. Despite the specificities of the UK relationship with the EU, some elements might resonate in other countries, especially since Eurosceptic sentiments are growing across Europe and since there is an increasing disconnect between European citizens and the European project.
In addition, the UK debate is rekindling talks of more flexibility within the EU at a time when “more Europe” has been headlining every European Council for the past few years. Despite the stepping-up toward more integration, there seems to be a slow but genuine realization that the steps taken so far and those that are on the agenda today could fundamentally change the EU and national politics. Those changes may eventually occur, but they require a leap of faith that some may not be prepared to take at face value. Talks of “more flexibility” may become less taboo across Europe and shall be addressed. The Dutch “subsidiarity review” is a resounding example in that matter. What kind of flexibility are the British talking about? What kind of flexibility could be acceptable for other member states? What could be the consequences for the EU to accept more flexibility politically and institutionally?
This expert seminar will be held under the Chatham House rule. The objective is to open a frank discussion about an issue that is likely to gain attention in the coming years.
Programme:
11.30-11.45 Registration
11.45-13.15 The UK Domestic Debate: Is the Europe debate as polarised as portrayed and can it export?
Lord Stewart Wood, Shadow Minister without Portfolio and Adviser to Ed Miliband, London
Vivien Pertusot, Head of Ifri Brussels, Brussels
Chair: Paul Adamson, Editor-in-chief, E! Sharp, Brussels
13.15-14.15 Lunch
14.15-15.45 Flexibility: How contortionist could the EU be?
William Sleath, Head of Unit, Secretary General of the European Commission, Brussels
Piotr Kaczynski, Policy Advisor, European Parliament, Brussels
Chair: Yann-Sven Rittelmeyer, Research Fellow, Study Committee for Franco-German Relations, Ifri, Paris
Other events
Brussels, Germany, France and Italy Facing the Energy and Industrial Crises: Coordinated or Diverging Trajectories?
Amidst soaring defense spending, higher borrowing costs, erosion of energy intensive industries, renewed energy price hikes and possibly physical shortages, the European Union and its Member States are again struggling to stabilize the European economies. Governments are tempted by uncoordinated, short-term moves while in Brussels, there is a struggle between the “more of the same” and the “scrap it largely” approaches to the transition.
Geopolitical stakes of the New Moon race
As the United States, China, and India solidify their lunar ambitions, Europe is still seeking to define its stance: should it be a reliable partner or an autonomous strategic player? This conference will examine the stakes of this new race to the Moon and Europe’s interest in asserting itself as a lunar power through partnerships, industrial ambitions, and whether its participation in the new lunar race serves as a lever for strategic autonomy and internal cohesion, or an illustration of its dependence.