More flexibility: What does the UK want and what could the others accept?
Practical information
The United Kingdom is undergoing an important debate vis-à-vis its membership to the European Union. Domestic in essence, this debate however needs to be better appreciated across Europe. Despite the specificities of the UK relationship with the EU, some elements might resonate in other countries, especially since Eurosceptic sentiments are growing across Europe and since there is an increasing disconnect between European citizens and the European project.
In addition, the UK debate is rekindling talks of more flexibility within the EU at a time when “more Europe” has been headlining every European Council for the past few years. Despite the stepping-up toward more integration, there seems to be a slow but genuine realization that the steps taken so far and those that are on the agenda today could fundamentally change the EU and national politics. Those changes may eventually occur, but they require a leap of faith that some may not be prepared to take at face value. Talks of “more flexibility” may become less taboo across Europe and shall be addressed. The Dutch “subsidiarity review” is a resounding example in that matter. What kind of flexibility are the British talking about? What kind of flexibility could be acceptable for other member states? What could be the consequences for the EU to accept more flexibility politically and institutionally?
This expert seminar will be held under the Chatham House rule. The objective is to open a frank discussion about an issue that is likely to gain attention in the coming years.
Programme:
11.30-11.45 Registration
11.45-13.15 The UK Domestic Debate: Is the Europe debate as polarised as portrayed and can it export?
Lord Stewart Wood, Shadow Minister without Portfolio and Adviser to Ed Miliband, London
Vivien Pertusot, Head of Ifri Brussels, Brussels
Chair: Paul Adamson, Editor-in-chief, E! Sharp, Brussels
13.15-14.15 Lunch
14.15-15.45 Flexibility: How contortionist could the EU be?
William Sleath, Head of Unit, Secretary General of the European Commission, Brussels
Piotr Kaczynski, Policy Advisor, European Parliament, Brussels
Chair: Yann-Sven Rittelmeyer, Research Fellow, Study Committee for Franco-German Relations, Ifri, Paris
Other events
A New Moment for Central Europe? Regional Cooperation in a Time of European Strategic Choices
Recent political developments in Central Europe have revived the debate about the future of regional cooperation and the Visegrád Group. Changes in Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, together with Austria’s growing interest in closer cooperation with its neighbours, could create new opportunities for dialogue and coordination around shared priorities.
China’s Nuclear Buildup: Developments, Drivers, and Implications for Major-Power Relations and Arms Control
China has been steadily expanding its nuclear arsenal for several years amid levels of geopolitical tension unseen since the end of the Cold War, marked by a resurgence in nuclear proliferation and a broader, global arms race.
Reinventing Coordination in an Age of Fragmentation
The world economy is being reordered. The certainties of the post-Cold War era, open trade, dollar centrality, predictable multilateral coordination, are giving way to a landscape shaped by rivalry between the United States and China, the weaponization of interdependence, and a scramble to secure supply chains, technologies and critical resources. What once looked like a stable architecture now appears fragile, contested, and in places actively being dismantled.