Crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. A Stress Test for Taiwan with Global Implications
The large-scale military operation carried out by the United States (US) and Israel against Iran triggered an Iranian retaliation that resulted in the partial destruction of natural gas liquefaction infrastructure and severe disruption of maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz. The economies of East Asia—South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan in particular—are highly exposed to this crisis due to their reliance on liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports for electricity generation.
Titre
Key Takeaways
The Middle East hydrocarbons accounted for 16% of Taiwan’s electricity generation in 2025 and more than 80% of the helium required for semiconductor manufacturing is imported from the region.
Supply has been maintained through the redirection of cargoes initially destined for other clients, but at the cost of significant additional expenses borne by public energy companies.
It includes a reduction in dependence on the Middle East in favor of US LNG, a revival of nuclear power, and the temporary use of coal to stabilize prices. Renewable energy sources, for their part, are not currently benefiting from the same momentum.
Greater awareness of this vulnerability is likely to further justify extending the concept of energy security to industrial security in Taiwan.
In Taiwan, an archipelago of 24 million people claimed by China, this crisis is significant for two reasons. First, it comes at a time when Taiwan’s electricity system is undergoing a transformation aimed at simultaneously meeting high electricity demand, greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, and a quest for resilience in the face of hybrid pressures exerted by China. Second, the archipelago is the world leader in so-called “logic” semiconductors, which form the basis of artificial intelligence (AI) applications: any disruption to their production—which is highly intensive in electricity and helium, a byproduct of certain gas fields—is likely to have global repercussions.
In this context, the crisis in the Middle East serves as a real-world test of Taiwan’s industrial and energy resilience.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. A Stress Test for Taiwan with Global Implications
France’s View: From Diplomacy to Public-Private Action
France has emerged as the EU’s IMEC forerunner, combining port infrastructure, diplomatic alliances and public-private cooperation. With Marseille Fos at its core, the country brings a strategic hub for logistics, energy and digital connectivity to the corridor.
Trump II, the Crisis of the Rules-Based Order and Europe’s Indo-Pacific Strategy
This article examines the implications of Trump II for Europe’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific. The piece contends that Trump II is accelerating the erosion of the rules-based order and undermining the relevance of the Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) concept, while forcing Europe to refocus on its own continental security amid US retrenchment. Paradoxically, these very constraints create conditions for a more autonomous, pragmatic, and explicitly interest-driven European engagement in the Indo-Pacific, rather than outright withdrawal.
China and Trade in Critical Raw Materials (CRMs)
Critical raw materials (CRMs) have become central features of a new dynamic in global power politics, with China now wielding considerable leverage. Amid rising regional and global uncertainty, resource security is back in the spotlight as a key determinant of sovereignty and national security for Europe, its allies and its partners. The very survival of key, even vital industries, from automotive to aerospace to health to energy to defense, is at stake.
Japan’s Energy Policy after Hormuz. Security, Competitiveness, and Decarbonization
The 2026 Hormuz crisis has strengthened rather than weakened the rationale for Japan’s decarbonization strategy, contrary to what might have been expected. Rather than energy policy supplanting climate policy, the two should actually be viewed as inseparable.