Search on Ifri.org

About Ifri

Frequent searches

Suggestions

Artificial Promises or Real Regulation? Inventing Global AI Governance

Studies
|
Date de publication
Image de couverture de la publication
Cover of the study "Artificial Promises or Real Regulation?"
Accroche

The risks inherent to the unregulated use of AI, a key technology and vector of profound transformations within societies underline the pressing need to harmonize governance efforts at the international level. The Summit for Action on Artificial Intelligence to be held in Paris in mid-February could be an unprecedented timely occasion to agree on a global governance framework of AI for the public good.

Image principale
AI global governance, built by a multiplicity of actors. Image produced on Canva by Emma Badaoui © Ifri, 2025
AI global governance, built by a multiplicity of actors. Image produced on Canva by Emma Badaoui © Ifri, 2025
Table of contents
Table of contents
body

Arising from the political and economic ambitions of a plurality of players with often divergent interests, the international framework of artificial intelligence (AI) is an acute reflection of contemporary geopolitical tensions.

The risks inherent to the development and mass adoption of AI, a key technology and vector of profound transformations within societies for health, education, employment or the environment, underline the pressing need to harmonize governance efforts at the international level.

Global governance of AI relies on the ability of state and non-state players to set common standards on technological risks, the boundaries to be drawn, and the principles to be safeguarded. These endeavors aim to promote the safe development of AI that is universal, adapted to cultural diversities, free from bias, and respectful of democratic values and fundamental rights and freedoms.

However, residual political, economic and legal challenges exacerbated by the limits of existing regulatory frameworks – in the face of increasing balkanization of governance approaches and fragmentation of the international community – considerably complicate the implementation of such an initiative.

Given the intrinsically evolving nature of AI, it is vital to build an adaptable and flexible “future-proof” governance framework capable of anticipating and adjusting to technical advances.

The Summit for Action on Artificial Intelligence to be held in Paris in February is an unprecedented timely occasion to agree on a shared vision of AI governance that is sustainable and inclusive. For decision-makers, it’s an opportunity to better grasp the evolution of practices, regulatory shortcomings, the interests influencing the agreements under construction, and the compromises needed to frame AI on a global scale in the years to come.

Decoration

Available in:

ISBN / ISSN

979-10-373-0982-2

Share

Download the full analysis

This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.

Artificial Promises or Real Regulation? Inventing Global AI Governance

Decoration
Author(s)
Photo
laure_de_rochegonde

Laure de ROUCY-ROCHEGONDE

Intitulé du poste
Image principale
Authentic Modern High Tech Robot Weapon
Center for Geopolitics of Technology
Accroche centre

Artificial intelligence (AI), 5G, cybersecurity, robotics, semiconductors, space…Technologies—particularly digital technologies—now profoundly affect all human activities and, by extension, international relations. The political, strategic, economic, and social stakes that arise from them are expressed across multiple political levels, involving states, international organizations, and private companies alike. International dynamics of competition and cooperation are being reshaped as a result. To address these challenges, Ifri launched its Geopolitics of Technology Center in 2020, offering a distinctly European perspective on the international issues surrounding so-called critical technologies.

Image principale

Trump II vs. Digital Governance: A Crusade in the United States and Europe

Date de publication
01 April 2026
Accroche

Since taking office, the Trump II administration has waged a systematic deregulation campaign targeting the tech sector in both the United States and Europe. How can Europe maintain dialogue while preserving its governance framework?

Image principale

Regulatory Dynamics and Tensions in the Space Sector: Towards and Americanization of Space Law?

Date de publication
13 November 2025
Accroche

The development of space law has gradually evolved from a top-down normative dynamic dominated by the founding impetus of the UN to a bottom-up normativity driven by national and industrial practices. This evolution is now accompanied by growing normative competition, raising the risk of an Americanization of space law and prompting the question of a European response.

Philippe ACHILLEAS
Image principale

The Sustainability of Space Operations: An Opportunity for European Leadership?

Date de publication
19 September 2025
Accroche

As space becomes a key arena for power projection strategies, while facing growth and diversification of orbital activities, the concept of “space sustainability” is emerging as a new framework of analysis for space governance. 

Jérôme BARBIER
Image principale

The “Huawei Saga” in Europe Revisited: German Lessons for the Rollout of 6G

Date de publication
02 June 2025
Accroche

While the European Union attempted to coordinate a collective response through its 5G Toolbox in Europe’s 5G infrastructure, member states diverged significantly in balancing political, economic, and technological considerations. Germany, despite its economic ties to China and status as Europe’s largest telecom market, only reached a tentative agreement in July 2024—one that appears largely symbolic. 

Tim RÜHLIG
Page image credits
AI global governance, built by a multiplicity of actors. Image produced on Canva by Emma Badaoui © Ifri, 2025

How can this study be cited?

Image de couverture de la publication
Cover of the study "Artificial Promises or Real Regulation?"
Laure de ROUCY-ROCHEGONDE, « Artificial Promises or Real Regulation? Inventing Global AI Governance », Studies, Ifri, 3 February 2025.
Copy
Image de couverture de la publication
Cover of the study "Artificial Promises or Real Regulation?"

Artificial Promises or Real Regulation? Inventing Global AI Governance