DeepSeek, hailed as a champion of Chinese AI, represents less a revolution than a significant optimization of existing technologies. Doubts remain regarding the figures put forward by the start-up, inviting a more measured response to the media hype surrounding China’s technological catch-up. Nonetheless, DeepSeek signals the need to question an economic model based solely on the race for computational power. By betting on open innovation, Europe can carve out its own path in a competition that is far from being a zero-sum game.
The release of the generative artificial intelligence (AI) model DeepSeek-R on January 20th, 2025, set off a wave of more or less sincere panic in Silicon Valley. With performances surpassing those of OpenAI’s ChatGPT4, the small Chinese start-up, 143 employees strong at the time, reaffirmed its talents, first glimpsed a month earlier with the publication of DeepSeek v3 in late 2024. Founded and led since 2023 by Liang Wenfeng, head of the High-Flyer hedge fund of which DeepSeek is a subsidiary, the company has benefited from substantial initial funding, allowing it to devote itself to research rather than chasing profitability. Its ties to Chinese authorities remain unclear, and its sudden success may have come as a pleasant surprise for Beijing, which has hailed it as a national champion in its technological competition with Washington.
Rather than a “Sputnik moment”, the U.S. leaders of this rapidly changing industry are now experiencing a “DeepSeek moment”, as so-called “reasoning” models mark a significant step in the evolution of large language models (LLMs). DeepSeek-R1, drawing inspiration from its competitors, also reflects the growing popularity of distillation, a process whereby the capabilities and “knowledge” of another AI model can be extracted by training based on its responses, resulting in a credible iteration of the model. The freely accessible model reflects China’s strategic positioning in open-source AI, and challenges Europe’s role in a game that appears to be less rigid and more open.
This Memo is available in French and English.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
A "DeepSeek Moment"?
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesEurope at the Crossroads of DefTech: Rethinking the European Defense Innovation Ecosystem
“The way I look at Iron Dome is as the ultimate manifestation of the future of the United States’ role in future conflicts, which is not to be the world police, but to be the world gun store,” said Palmer Luckey in November 2023. Luckey is the founder of Anduril, one of the most prominent DefTech companies. The ambition is clear: to participate in global rearmament by capitalizing on the quality of American innovations and to dominate the arms market—at least in the West—through technological mastery.
How Technology Is Reshaping the World Order
The central role of technology in the competition between the major powers is fueling an ever-more intense rivalry. Artificial intelligence is enabling large corporations to accrue unprecedented power, with consequences for states and even for international conflict. However, states do have tools at their disposal to regulate these developments. In this international competition, Europe has a strong hand, but must be prepared to play its cards in order to create a new kind of international cooperation.
Trump II vs. Digital Governance: A Crusade in the United States and Europe
Since taking office, the Trump II administration has waged a systematic deregulation campaign targeting the tech sector in both the United States and Europe. How can Europe maintain dialogue while preserving its governance framework?
Regulatory Dynamics and Tensions in the Space Sector: Towards and Americanization of Space Law?
The development of space law has gradually evolved from a top-down normative dynamic dominated by the founding impetus of the UN to a bottom-up normativity driven by national and industrial practices. This evolution is now accompanied by growing normative competition, raising the risk of an Americanization of space law and prompting the question of a European response.