What Can Europe Hope to Achieve in Tomorrow's World?
In this special issue of Politique étrangère devoted to the proceedings of the conference organized by Ifri on April 10, 2019, in the Grand Amphitheater of the Sorbonne, on the occasion of its fortieth anniversary, discover the debate moderated by Christine Ockrent between Franziska Brantner, Jean-Louis Boulanges, Bernardino Leon, and Igor Yurgens.
Christine Ockrent
Thank you for being so many in this splendid place and for listening so attentively to the Minister of Economy, and the Executive Chairman and founder of Ifri. Thierry de Montbrial has encouraged us to undertake psychoanalysis as it were, but it seems to me that, after the rather optimistic and dynamic picture painted by Bruno Le Maire, and the rather dark picture painted by Thierry de Montbrial, we can congratulate Ifri once again for having chosen to celebrate its fortieth anniversary in the aftermath of a summit that brought China and the European Union together in Brussels. Today, a summit of heads of state and government is also opening, which has to decide, or not, on a new timetable for the endless chaos of Brexit. The coincidence of the two events leads us to think about what Europe is today, Euro-power. We are going to talk about Europower, because it is a major economic and commercial entity; but we could also talk about a weakened Europe, weakened from within by its doubts, its identity problem, its inward-looking attitudes, as well as by destabilization attempts by neighbors who are not always benevolent and also about this often cowardly Europe that we all regret, which seems indecisive, so unsure of its ability to make its mark on history.
I would like to start by asking Franziska to give us her reaction to the speeches of this morning, and how, as a Bundestag member and a young politician of the future, she sees this Europe.
What is the purpose of Europe?
Franziska Brantner
I share Thierry de Montbrial's and the Minister's assessments on the choice the Europeans have to make today. Do we want to remain at the center of a pingpong process between the Americans and the Chinese, or do we want to define our own future? The question applies to all areas, and I am thinking specifically about the topic of digitalization: we have hardly talked about it, but it is very important. Do we accept the idea of US or Chinese digitalization, of private or state monopoly, with the risk of total censorship, or of a private monopoly that defines what we have the right to do or not? For example, at the moment, there is a big debate in Germany about the issue of 5G: do we want to retain European ability to control the infrastructure of the economy of the future, or do we decide to hand everything over to the Chinese? […]
Franziska Brantner is a Bundestag member.
Jean-Louis Bourlanges is a member of the National Assembly and Vice-Chair of the European Affairs Committee.
Bernardino Leon, a former EU Special Representative for the Southern Mediterranean, is Director General of the Emirates Diplomatic Academy.
Igor Jurgens is Chair of the Institute of Contemporary Development (Russian Federation).
Christine Ockrent is a journalist and a writer.
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
What Can Europe Hope to Achieve in Tomorrow's World?
Author(s)
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
A New Path for Europe
The construction of the European Union is historically inseparable from the emergence, at the end of World War II, of an Atlantic world dominated by the United States. Successive enlargements and the revision of U.S. policy are undermining the concepts upon which the European Union has been built since the fall of the USSR. It is undoubtedly time to return to a path of more diverse groupings, corresponding to the levels of commitment and the interests of the states of the Old Continent.
How Technology Is Reshaping the World Order
The central role of technology in the competition between the major powers is fueling an ever-more intense rivalry. Artificial intelligence is enabling large corporations to accrue unprecedented power, with consequences for states and even for international conflict. However, states do have tools at their disposal to regulate these developments. In this international competition, Europe has a strong hand, but must be prepared to play its cards in order to create a new kind of international cooperation.
Reflections on A Darkening World
The system that emerged after the Second World War to regulate international relations is now moribund. Russia and China may have weakened it, but it seems that Donald Trump’s United States may deliver the fatal blow. The prevailing atmosphere is one of power struggles, and the rise of nationalisms is fraught with danger. The artificial intelligence revolution also needs to be factored into this equation, as it has a strong bearing on how much power different players can exert. In this respect, Europe must ensure it does not get left behind.
1936-2026: 90th Anniversary of the Journal "Politique étrangère"
Founded in 1936 and published by the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri), Politique étrangère, France’s longest-running journal of international relations, is set to publish a special issue in early June 2026. Bringing together distinguished French and international contributors, this issue aims to provide an overview of an uncertain world and its possible futures. In an unprecedented undertaking, Politique étrangère brings together a wide range of international contributions in an effort to grasp a global landscape that is at once open and fragmented, in all its diversity and dynamism. Through in-depth analyses of cross-cutting challenges, reflections on methods and structures of governance, and projections into futures feared or envisioned by creators from around the world—ranging from alternative histories to speculative thought experiments—the various approaches complement and challenge one another, opening up broad avenues for reflection.