Najib Razak’s Malaysia: A solid economy on a foundation of political tension
Najib Razak began his term as Prime Minister of Malaysia in 2009 amidst a severe global economic crisis, concern over spiraling public debt and fears the country would fall into the ominous “middle income trap”.
Uncertainties abounded over the direction of the national economy, and in particular its capacity to face challenges associated with a significant opening-up and the strong power of the state, which itself was highly dependent on oil rents. But thanks to China, which has become Malaysia’s first trading partner, growth rebounded in 2010.
Accompanying the launch of the tenth five year plan, the government introduced a new economic model from 2011 and embarked upon a set of economic and bureaucratic reforms (Economic Transformation Program 2011-2020) in order to bring Malaysia up to the rank a fully developed country by 2020. Najib Razak also announced the implementation of a post-racial social policy (1Malaysia) and important reforms in the field of freedoms and fundamental rights.
But 2013 marked a turning point in the field of human rights, democracy and national harmony in this multi-ethnic and multi-religious country with a Muslim majority. Following the thirteenth general elections, the Barisan National coalition dominated by Najib’s Malay party (United Malaysian National Organization - UMNO) managed to hold on to power thanks to an ultra-favorable mapping of electoral districts, while the opposition won 51 % of the popular vote. In this tense political context, structural reforms would be pursued, leading to an economic consolidation and a rebalancing in terms of partners, industrial sectors, investments and role of domestic demand compared to external demand. However, political and democratic opening would be stopped. The financial scandal 1MDB, revealed on the international scene by the Wall Street Journal in the summer of 2015, led Najib Razak to harden his stance and pursue unprecedented political tightening in order to reassert his authority. If the national economy seems to be put on the right track and able to withstand to the drop in the oil prices and to the Chinese economic slowdown, parliamentary democracy and the political and social climate have been considerably degraded compared to the term of Najib’s predecessor, Abdullah Badawi.
Author(s)
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programs
Center for Asian Studies
Asia is a nerve center for multiple global economic, political and security challenges. The Center for Asian Studies provides documented expertise and a platform for discussion on Asian issues to accompany decision makers and explain and contextualize developments in the region for the sake of a larger public dialogue.
The Center's research is organized along two major axes: relations between Asia's major powers and the rest of the world; and internal economic and social dynamics of Asian countries. The Center's research focuses primarily on China, Japan, India, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific, but also covers Southeast Asia, the Korean peninsula and the Pacific Islands.
The Centre for Asian Studies maintains close institutional links with counterpart research institutes in Europe and Asia, and its researchers regularly carry out fieldwork in the region.
The Center organizes closed-door roundtables, expert-level seminars and a number of public events, including an Annual Conference, that welcome experts from Asia, Europe and the United States. The work of Center’s researchers, as well as that of their partners, is regularly published in the Center’s electronic journal Asie.Visions.
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
Afghanistan-Pakistan: The Overlooked War at the Margins of the Middle East Conflict
Pakistan has historically maintained the closest ties to the Taliban movement and initially viewed its return to power in Afghanistan in the summer of 2021 with considerable optimism. The bilateral relationship has since deteriorated, and the two neighbors have been caught in a cycle of escalation since last fall. In October 2025, Pakistan launched its first airstrikes on Kabul. For three weeks in February–March 2026, Afghanistan intensified ground assaults on the Pakistani side of the border as well as drone attacks on Islamabad and Rawalpindi. Pakistan, for its part, has intensified airstrikes on Afghan border areas, as well as on Kabul and Kandahar. Given the dynamics at play at the bilateral and regional levels, the prospects for a sustained return to stability appear limited.
European Union-India: Lasting Rapprochement or Partnership of Convenience?
The partnership between the European Union (EU) and India has long been limited to economic exchanges. Its political dimension has gradually developed, culminating in its elevation to the status of a “strategic partnership” in 2004. However, the failure of negotiations for a free-trade agreement in 2013 slowed this momentum. Since the early 2020s, in an uncertain geopolitical context, bilateral rapprochement has gained new momentum.
Japan’s Takaichi Landslide: A New Face of Power
Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has turned her exceptional popularity into a historic political victory. The snap elections of February 8 delivered an overwhelming majority for the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), driven by strong support from young voters, drawn to her iconoclastic and dynamic image, and from conservative voters reassured by her vision of national assertiveness. This popularity lays the foundation for an ambitious strategy on both the domestic and international fronts.
The U.S. Policy Toward Taiwan Beyond Donald Trump: Mapping the American Stakeholders of U.S.-Taiwan Relations
Donald Trump’s return to the White House reintroduced acute uncertainty into the security commitment of the United States (U.S.) to Taiwan. Unlike President Joe Biden, who repeatedly stated the determination to defend Taiwan, President Trump refrains from commenting on the hypothetical U.S. response in the context of a cross-Strait crisis.