Practical information
Accessibility
Themes and regions
Related centers and programs
The United States’ strategic posture is currently marked by significant uncertainty and contradictory signals.
On the one hand, President Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed his intention to reduce the role of nuclear weapons, even suggesting steps toward denuclearization and renewed arms control discussions with Russia and China. On the other hand, his administration has continued—and in some cases accelerated—programs to modernize the U.S. nuclear arsenal and introduced the controversial project of the Golden Dome missile defense system in order to maintain a strategic advantage over Moscow and Beijing. This ambiguity, now at the heart of his second term, raises numerous questions about the evolution of U.S. nuclear doctrine and its implications for international stability.
Speaker :
Dr. Rebeccah Heinrichs, senior fellow et director of the Capstone Initiative at Hudson Institute (Washington, D.C.)
Chairwoman :
Héloïse Fayet, head of the Deterrence & Proliferation research program at Ifri
Contact
For any request or information, please contact the Security Studies Center: [email protected].
Related Subjects
Other events
Brussels, Germany, France and Italy Facing the Energy and Industrial Crises: Coordinated or Diverging Trajectories?
Amidst soaring defense spending, higher borrowing costs, erosion of energy intensive industries, renewed energy price hikes and possibly physical shortages, the European Union and its Member States are again struggling to stabilize the European economies. Governments are tempted by uncoordinated, short-term moves while in Brussels, there is a struggle between the “more of the same” and the “scrap it largely” approaches to the transition.
Managing nuclear escalation: what's in intrawar deterrence?
Since the return of high-intensity warfare in Europe and the rise of strategic tensions in the Indo-Pacific, the issue of managing escalation between nuclear powers has taken center stage in U.S. strategic thinking and, to a lesser extent, in the European one.
Geopolitical stakes of the New Moon race
As the United States, China, and India solidify their lunar ambitions, Europe is still seeking to define its stance: should it be a reliable partner or an autonomous strategic player? This conference will examine the stakes of this new race to the Moon and Europe’s interest in asserting itself as a lunar power through partnerships, industrial ambitions, and whether its participation in the new lunar race serves as a lever for strategic autonomy and internal cohesion, or an illustration of its dependence.