Religion, Moral Order, and the Resacralization of International Politics
The question of the role of beliefs in international politics extends beyond that of religion alone. To an ever-increasing extent, the world is structured by competing normative projects, rather than straightforward civilizational blocs. With liberal universalism in retreat, religious traditions offer narratives, legitimacy, and international networks that support alternative visions of moral order, making the global system more pluralistic but also more unstable.
For much of the late 20th century, it seemed reasonable to assume that religion was gradually receding from the center of international politics. Modernization theory anticipated a process of secularization and the experience of Western Europe in particular appeared to confirm that trajectory. As levels of religious affiliation and participation declined in parts of the North Atlantic world, it became easier to imagine that economic development, urbanization, and liberal democratic governance would progressively relocate religion to the private sphere. After the Cold War, this assumption was reinforced by a broader narrative of convergence: ideological rivalry had ended, and liberal democracy appeared not only institutionally durable but normatively ascendant.
Three decades later, that confidence looks overstated. Religious language is now woven into political discourse across a wide range of contexts. Russian officials frame aspects of their foreign policy in explicitly civilizational terms linked to Orthodoxy. Indian political rhetoric increasingly invokes a civilizational understanding of the state. In the Middle East, religious authority remains intertwined with regional alignments. In multilateral forums, debates over gender, religious freedom, and cultural sovereignty routinely draw on explicitly moral and, at times, theological arguments. These developments are not confined to one region or one religious tradition. They cut across political systems and geographic boundaries.
It would be tempting to describe this shift simply as a “return of religion”. Yet such language obscures as much as it reveals. Religion never disappeared from international politics. Religious institutions, actors, and narratives have long shaped transnational activism, humanitarian engagement, conflict dynamics, and state legitimacy. What has changed is less the presence of religion than the status of the liberal normative framework within which it operated for several decades. [...]
Article Outline
- The End of the Secularization Illusion
- Rethinking Huntington: Civilizations and Moral Alignment
- Religion as Geopolitical Infrastructure
- Why Moralized Geopolitics Is More Volatile
- Implications for International Order
Peter Mandavillle is a Professor of Government and Politics at George Mason University and Senior Fellow at Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs. He has served in senior positions at the U.S. Department of State as well as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
Article published in Politique étrangère, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2026.
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Religion, Moral Order, and the Resacralization of International Politics
Iran: Anatomy of a Power at War
The elimination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and several high-ranking officials at the outset of the 2026 American-Israeli operation did not succeed in bringing down the Iranian regime. The regime had prepared for such a scenario, notably by decentralizing its structures. Moreover, it continues to adapt to war. The power of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is growing at the expense of the Shiite clergy. The security apparatus defends the country’s sovereignty and justifies its actions in the name of raison d’état.
“Remodeling” the Middle East?
Chaos continues to spread, seemingly without end, across the Middle East. The Israeli-American attack on Iran has resulted in a clear military and diplomatic failure, but it is paving the way for a regional realignment, the consequences of which remain uncertain. New regional groupings are taking shape, either centered around Israel or built on the prospect of coexistence with Tehran, alongside a decline in American influence and the marginalization of Europe, while China maintains a low-key presence.
Silicon Valley and War: Lessons from Ukraine
Over the course of international conflicts, and particularly in Ukraine, major tech companies have emerged as central actors. Initially subject to wartime maneuvering, they have since become decisive actors in their own right, privatizing a significant share of wartime exchanges, shaping the information flows of societies, and presenting themselves as providers of security. This situation raises important questions about states’ autonomy in making decisions and taking action.
Does Artificial Intelligence Change the Nature of War?
From Gaza to Ukraine and Iran, current conflicts are being shaped by the arrival of artificial intelligence and robots on the battlefield. The changes under way are so profound that humans risk rapidly losing control over entire aspects of the conduct of military operations. While these technological developments are altering the character of war, their impact on the very nature of war itself remains a matter of debate.