Search on Ifri.org

About Ifri

Frequent searches

Suggestions

NATO 1949-2009

Politique étrangère Issues from Politique Etrangère
|
Date de publication
|
Image de couverture de la publication
Couverture PE n° 4-2009 - English
Accroche

A little more than 60 years after its creation, questions about the future of the Alliance emerge at the intersection of three observations. First, the complexity of the world, which makes the Alliance ‘inevitable,' since it is a rare source of stability and solidarity in a world marked by uncertainty. Second, American doubt. If the United States was the global policeman for some simple minds at the start of the 1990s, others see the US as having used up its power in the adventurism of the Bush Administration. The future will wipe out these two caricatures. For members of the Alliance, the US will long continue to be a necessary friend, whose power and possible abandonment are feared. The third observation is, obviously, Europe's incurable ethnocentricity: if Europeans knew how to look at the world and their place in it, they would rapidly give up their mediocre powerlessness. History is moving on elsewhere and raises questions on its chaotic path to which others are replying more quickly. In the years ahead, therefore, the Alliance may lorge ahead without Europe or nearly without it, despite the fact that Europeans' specific know-how could be useful.

Image principale
Archive de Politique étrangère
Corps analyses

The year 1989: 40 years – and victory, without a shot being fired. The Atlantic Alliance stood as the clearest symbol of victory by the West, as the opposing camp split up and unpicked the Warsaw Pact. The Alliance was victorious even though it had no responsibility for victory. It was first in line to take on the gains and risks of victory, including the new image of the West, which suddenly saw itself as the world, along with the danger of Western-centrism that took ten years to dissipate. Given its gains, successes, metaphysical doubts, errors, and failures, debates about the Alliance, albeit somewhat distorted but nevertheless truthful, reflected a West that no longer knew its limits, and that, basking in glory, wondered about its future.

Since 1989, the Atlantic Alliance has displayed great malleability, and an exceptional capacity to adapt itself to the world (it is recalled at the start of this publication that the French are the only ones who like to distinguish both institutionally and politically between the Atlantic Alliance and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization – NATO). The skeptics, often but not only French, have been wrong in believing that its bureaucratic torpor would prevent it from keeping up with rapidly changing history. The Alliance has turned into a formidable machine for ‘living together’ during the last 15 years, for obvious reasons, linked to the rejection of the all-too recent Soviet domination, along with other more complex issues that we will leave to future historians. This is undoubtedly its most spectacular success, which is far more unexpected than its considerable military might over the years. Yet, the Alliance’s military effectiveness (assumed though never questioned) also played a decisive role; for the last 20 years, NATO has been the only military coalition that was immediately credible (and it will probably remain thus for a long time to come). For this reason, NATO took over in the Balkans in 1994, only a few years after it had been marginalized there. It is also why NATO is primarily seen as the supreme guarantee of security – inalienable in the strongest meaning of the term – for all its members, old and new.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

The Background to the Debate

A Vibrant and Flexible Alliance, by Lord Robertson of Port Ellen
NATO from Washington (1949) to Strasbourg/Kehl (2009), by Karl-Heinz Kamp

 

From an enlarged NATO to a global NATO?

Towards a Security Web, by Zbigniew Brzezinski
The Global NATO Debate, by Michael Clarke
Considerations on NATO's Future Direction, by Christopher S. Chivvis

 

NATO, Europe and Russia

NATO: A View from Central Europe, by Bogdan Klich
NATO and ESDP: Institutional Complexities and Political Realities, by Jolyon Howorth
NATO and Russia: A View from Moscow, by Sergueï Rogov
NATO-Russia: Is the ‘Russian Question' European?, by Thomas Gomart

 

France and NATO

France and NATO: An History, by Maurice Vaïsse
France's ‘Return' to NATO: An Inopportune Decision, by Jean-Pierre Chevènement

 

Reforming NATO?

NATO and Nuclear Weapons, by Ian Anthony
Reforming NATO's Institutions: Pressing Need, Enduring Obstacles, New Opportunities, by Diego A. Ruiz Palmer

 

Counterpoint, 1964
The Reform of NATO and the Free World's Security Pact, by Eugen Gerstenmaier

 

Decoration

Available in:

Regions and themes

Thématiques analyses

ISBN / ISSN

ISBN : 978-2-86592-632-9

Share

Image principale
 A soldier watching a sunset on an armored infantry fighting vehicle
Security Studies Center
Accroche centre

Heir to a tradition dating back to the founding of Ifri, the Security Studies Center provides public and private decision-makers as well as the general public with the keys to understanding power relations and contemporary modes of conflict as well as those to come. Through its positioning at the juncture of politics and operations, the credibility of its civil-military team and the wide distribution of its publications in French and English, the Center for Security Studies constitutes in the French landscape of think tanks a unique center of research and influence on the national and international defense debate.

Image principale

The Future of Europe from the US and Asian Point of View

Date de publication
30 December 2019
Accroche

In this special issue of Foreign Policy devoted to the proceedings of the conference organized by Ifri on April 10, 2019, in the Grand Amphitheater of the Sorbonne, on the occasion of its fortieth anniversary, discover the debate moderated by Sylvie Kauffmann between John Allen and Kishore Mahbubani.

John ALLEN Kishore MAHBUBANI Sylvie KAUFFMANN
Image principale

What Expectations Can Europe Meet in Tomorrow's World?

Accroche

In this special issue of Politique étrangère devoted to the proceedings of the conference organized by Ifri on April 10, 2019, in the Grand Amphitheater of the Sorbonne, on the occasion of its fortieth anniversary, discover the debate moderated by Christine Ockrent between Franziska Brantner, Jean-Louis Boulanges, Bernardino Leon, and Igor Yurgens.

Franziska BRANTNER Jean-­Louis BOURLANGES Bernardino LEON Igor YURGENS Christine OCKRENT
Image principale

The World of Yesterday and Tomorrow

Accroche

In this special issue of Foreign Policy devoted to the proceedings of the conference organized by Ifri on April 10, 2019, in the Grand Amphitheater of the Sorbonne, on the occasion of its fortieth anniversary, discover the speech by Thierry de Montbrial, Founder and Executive Chairman of Ifri.

Image principale

The Future of Europe in the Context of Sino-American Competition

Date de publication
30 December 2019
Accroche

In this special issue of Foreign Policy devoted to the proceedings of the conference organized by Ifri on April 10, 2019, in the Grand Amphitheater of the Sorbonne, on the occasion of its fortieth anniversary, discover the speech by Bruno Le Maire, Minister of Economy and Finance.

Bruno LE MAIRE

How can this study be cited?

Image de couverture de la publication
Couverture PE n° 4-2009 - English
NATO 1949-2009, from Ifri by
Copy