The Architecture of Money: A European Strategy for Tokenized Finance
This report examines how tokenization may reshape European financial sovereignty. Tokenization does more than digitize existing assets: it makes it possible to separate and recombine dimensions of monetary systems once considered inseparable. This creates new opportunities for financial integration but may also yield new forms of infrastructural and monetary dependence
Tokenized financial assets require both digital settlement infrastructures and compatible forms of money. If tokenized markets develop primarily around non-European infrastructures and dollar-denominated stablecoins, technological modernization could reinforce rather than reduce Europe’s financial dependence. Preserving European financial sovereignty therefore requires shaping the emerging ecosystem of tokenized finance through resilient European settlement infrastructures, competitive euro-denominated digital money, and supervisory frameworks capable of monitoring the financial architecture as a whole.
The Paper argues that tokenization may reduce fragmentation within individual financial ecosystems while increasing fragmentation between them. It redraws the existing borders of the global financial systems according to a new geopolitical map and yields an archipelago of tokenized ecosystems.
Bastien Buchwalter is an Assistant Professor of Finance at SKEMA Business School in Paris, France.
This report is also available in French: “L'architecture de la monnaie. Une stratégie européenne pour la finance tokenisée”.
Available in:
ISBN / ISSN
Share
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
The Architecture of Money: A European Strategy for Tokenized Finance
Geoeconomics and Geofinance Initiative
To analyze the impact of power rivalries and tensions on globalization, this initiative combines economic and political expertise. In the face of growing geopolitical risk, the goal is to decipher the dynamics of reconfiguration: protectionist pressures, sanctions, restrictions, industrial policies, and economic security concerns are redefining the rules of international trade. These tensions are also transforming international financial relations by undermining the foundations of trust and reshaping the global monetary system. They raise questions about the role of several key players: sovereign wealth funds, central banks, digital platforms, multilateral institutions, and financial infrastructure operators. In a context of profound disruption, simply refining existing approaches is no longer sufficient. The initiative is designed as a flexible model, drawing on diverse expertise to offer both broad overviews and targeted analyses. It also provides a platform for stakeholders and experts from various backgrounds to debate these issues freely.
The Transfer Paradox. Rethinking Global Imbalances
Global imbalances have come back to the top of the policy agenda. Many analyses and reports have been produced over recent months. The standard prescription involves better coordination of macroeconomic policies, with three familiar recommendations: higher consumption in China, higher investment in Europe, and fiscal consolidation in the United States.
Global imbalances, industrial policies, and the challenge of surging Chinese trade surpluses
The analysis of global imbalances faces a paradox: while the analytical focus has for decades been on the sustainability of current account deficits, out of concerns about their financial consequences, international political tensions stem mainly from enduring trade surpluses and their industrial impacts. Beyond President Trump’s outbursts, fears about the consequences of China’s trade surpluses are increasingly widespread.
Can Interdependence Persist in Tense Times? Insights from the 2nd Paris Geoeconomic Dialogue
Ifri’s 2nd Paris Geoeconomic Dialogue brought together in November 2025 experts, academics, and decision-makers around six themes relating to the prospects for interdependence in an increasingly tense international environment.
Central Banks: Challenges and Tools in Geopolitical Rivalries
Central banks have become major strategic players in international economic balances. Faced with systemic crises (2008, Covid-19), the major central banks have developed unprecedented coordination of their interventions, fostering the emergence of the “Jackson Hole consensus.”