Caught between China and the US: Southeast Asia’s Strategic Fence-Sitting
The secret of success for many Southeast Asian countries has been their choice of economic and diplomatic multilateralism. Fence-sitting between rival powers is becoming fraught. China inspires a degree of fear in the region, due to its clout and geographical proximity. And under Trump, the United States is on the offensive against the multilateral trade system, with major diplomatic consequences. Can Southeast Asian countries maintain their balance by embracing new partnerships?
We often read that, highly sought after for their location and potential, Southeast Asian (SEA) countries are maneuvering between two major powers, China and the United States, close to the former for economic reasons and to the latter for security reasons. The reality is more complex and nuanced, and increasingly so. SEANAP countries have sought to avoid taking sides, and their ability to derive the maximum benefit from their relationships has been one of the keys to their economic success and stability. In fact, they have been the major beneficiaries of the Sino-American rivalry thus far.
They have been able to capitalize on globalization and the ties they have forged with their two major partners, but also with partners such as Japan, European countries and, to a lesser extent, Australia, South Korea, and India. The secret to their economic success lies in their commitment to economic openness and multilateralism, as well as their integration into global value chains. This choice of multilateralism is also reflected in the diplomatic arena; the motto of these countries, remarkably illustrated during the Cold War, is indeed: “Don't ask us to choose.”...
However, Donald Trump's return could change the situation and make the balancing act more perilous. The US president's massive offensive against the multilateral system and his obsession with reducing the US trade deficit by attacking its economic partners, even allies, may alter the calculations of ASEAN countries. But rather than rushing into the arms of their big neighbor China, they may seek to increase their options and partners.
Sophie Boisseau du Rocher is a senior researcher specializing in Southeast Asian politics. She has previously taught at Sciences Po Paris and is a former associate research fellow at Ifri's Center for Asian Studies.
Françoise Nicolas is a senior advisor at Ifri's Center for Asian Studies.
This article is available only in French and has been published in Politique étrangère, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2025.
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Find out more
Discover all our analysesBetween the Lines of Questionable Battles
This article was published in Politique étrangère in 1979, the year the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri) was founded. In it, Raymond Aron reviews important events of the previous decade, such as the Vietnam War. He particularly reflects on the place of law, morality, force and national interest in international relations. Related topics, like the right to intervene and the responsibility to protect, are implicitly included in this article.
A Vibrant and Flexible Alliance
NATO has proved its renewed usefulness and is today fully engaged, well beyond its former frontiers, wherever its interests and those of its members are threatened.
NATO: From Washington (1949) to Strasbourg/Kehl (2009)
The Alliance cannot avoid a strategic debate about its role, missions and resources. This may be painful, but it will ensure clarity and prepare the Alliance for future challenges.
Towards a Security Web
There is no global mechanism that can guarantee security effectively in the face of the growing threat of political chaos, stemming from the recent political awakening of humanity. There is no global mechanism that can guarantee security effectively in the face of the growing threat of political chaos, stemming from the recent political awakening of humanity.