NATO and Nuclear Weapons
The changes in the way that NATO operates raise the question of whether the nuclear weapons stationed in Europe would, in a time of crisis, be an instrument of solidarity, or lead instead to divisiveness.
The 1999 Strategic Concept has been described as a core mission statement for NATO. The Secretary General of the Alliance, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, has established a Group of Experts to lay the groundwork for a new NATO Strategic Concept. The results of the Group of Experts work will be the subject of open consultation among and within the allies before inter-governmental discussions to elaborate a new document. This process is expected to lead to a new Strategic Concept being adopted by the end of 2010.
Among other things, the Strategic Concept lays out the main parameters of current NATO nuclear policy. There appears to be an emerging pattern of reviewing the Strategic Concept of NATO roughly every ten years, so the task facing the experts is to establish guiding principles for Alliance nuclear policy over the next ten years.
At the time of writing, the United States Department of Defense is reviewing its nuclear posture, a process that should be complete by the end of 2009. Aside from the work of the Group of Experts, NATO is also undertaking an internal review of nuclear deterrence requirements for the 21st century. The role, size and configuration of nuclear forces is therefore being evaluated in key NATO countries and collectively within the Alliance.
The United States has tried to create a positive environment for new steps in arms control through a number of political initiatives. In a speech in Prague in April 2009, President Obama reconnected the issues of nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament and emphasized the urgent need to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in international security. The Obama administration has also re-energized the bilateral nuclear arms-control negotiations with Russia and proposed convening a high-level summit in 2010 to discuss the security of nuclear materials worldwide. At the end of September 2009, President Obama chaired a meeting of the UN Security Council discussion of nuclear arms control. This meeting culminated in unanimous support for a Security Council resolution that called for existing nuclear arms-control law to be strengthened. The US administration has also shown a willingness to engage in dialogue with states that are currently considered to pose particular problems for nuclear arms control.
In Europe the leaders of France and the United Kingdom have also developed their thinking on what the next steps should be in creating the conditions not only for additional reductions, but for nuclear disarmament. […]
OUTLINE
- The changing threat picture and NATO’s nuclear response
- Short-range nuclear weapons in NATO strategy
- Engagement with Russia and the future of short-range nuclear weapons in NATO
Dr. Ian Anthony is Research Coordinator at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). He is Leader of the Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Programme. His recent publications include: Reforming Nuclear Export Controls: The Future of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (Stockholm, SIPRI, Research Report, No. 22, 2007).
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
NATO and Nuclear Weapons
Author(s)
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
Reforming NATO’s Institutions: Pressing Need, Enduring Obstacles, New Opportunities
The lessons learned from its engagement in Afghanistan, a desire to transform itself, and its current financial problems are all factors pointing to the need to reform the Alliance. Formulating a new Strategic Concept will allow institutional reform to be associated with a new sense of purpose.
The Reform of NATO and the Free World’s Security Pact
Reforming the structure does not go to the heart of the problem. A new understanding has to be reached among the allies that takes into consideration the political, economic and technical changes of the last decade.
The New Diplomatic Weight of Gulf Countries
The political and economic weight of the Gulf monarchies has increased considerably. These countries have diversified their economies and become logistic hubs, attracting large numbers of investors. They have also managed to extend their power beyond their borders. However, the wider regional fallout of the war begun by Hamas on October 7, 2023 has cast doubt on the Gulf’s stability, especially as it seems that the American security umbrella can no longer be taken for granted
Has ASEAN become Marginalized within Regional Security Architecture?
South Asian leaders continue to reiterate how “central” ASEAN is to the region’s security architecture. However, in practice, the tendency is to prioritize bilateral agreements, gradually marginalizing the organization. This fragmentation is weakening regional cooperation, accentuating divisions, and compromising stability in the context of growing tensions in the Indo-Pacific. These trends are worrying at a time when Sino-American rivalries are becoming more acute.