The Reform of NATO and the Free World’s Security Pact
Reforming the structure does not go to the heart of the problem. A new understanding has to be reached among the allies that takes into consideration the political, economic and technical changes of the last decade.
“We, the peoples of the United Nations, determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war ... to live together in peace with one another as good neighbors and to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security … have resolved to combine our efforts to accomplish these aims.”
Such are the core ideas behind the birth of the United Nations (UN) organization in June 1945. These ideas are the product of weariness and wariness about new wars breaking out, as well as of the realization that, in spite of divergences, the world is tending towards unity. Franklin D. Roosevelt, who had his own vision of this new interdependency, intended to establish its rules. Unfortunately, the UN organization and its Security Council proved inadequate in attempting to suppress or simply ease the mounting tension between the communist states and the Free World. Hence the profound deception that followed, since much hope had been placed in the United Nations. Faced with the frenzied aggressiveness of world communism – led by Moscow – it was becoming essential to equip the Free World with an efficient security system.
NATO’s purpose
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is the most important regional pact concluded within this system and the United States is the main protagonist behind the creation of this pact. Similar imperatives underlie the creation of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO), the Baghdad Pact (renamed the Central Treaty Organization, CENTO) and the security pact signed between the United States and Japan, as well as the United States’ intervention in Korea under the United Nations flag. In terms of Western policy, this system – one that is not closed on itself – is the practical consequence of the ‘containment’ policy. This ‘containment’ policy is the policy that all too easily replaced ‘rollback’ – the driving back, with varying degrees of violence, of world communism from the positions it had gained through strength or cunning. The containment policy, on the other hand, held steadfast against all attempts to replace it with a policy of retreat.
When the North Atlantic Treaty was signed on 4th April 1949, the Federal Republic of Germany did not yet exist, but the fact that the world was split into two was perhaps more obvious than it is 15 years later. […]
OUTLINE
- NATO’s purpose
- International changes and the transformation of NATO
- Burden-sharing, geographic limits and Alliance globalization
Eugen Gerstenmaier (1906-1986) distinguished himself by taking part in German resistance to Nazism through the Kreisau Circle, which was responsible for the attempted assassination of Hitler on 20th July 1944. He was a member of the German Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and President of the Bundestag between 1954 and 1969.
The paper is translated by Clémence Sebag.
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
The Reform of NATO and the Free World’s Security Pact
Author(s)
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
The New Diplomatic Weight of Gulf Countries
The political and economic weight of the Gulf monarchies has increased considerably. These countries have diversified their economies and become logistic hubs, attracting large numbers of investors. They have also managed to extend their power beyond their borders. However, the wider regional fallout of the war begun by Hamas on October 7, 2023 has cast doubt on the Gulf’s stability, especially as it seems that the American security umbrella can no longer be taken for granted
Has ASEAN become Marginalized within Regional Security Architecture?
South Asian leaders continue to reiterate how “central” ASEAN is to the region’s security architecture. However, in practice, the tendency is to prioritize bilateral agreements, gradually marginalizing the organization. This fragmentation is weakening regional cooperation, accentuating divisions, and compromising stability in the context of growing tensions in the Indo-Pacific. These trends are worrying at a time when Sino-American rivalries are becoming more acute.
Caught between China and the US: Southeast Asia’s Strategic Fence-Sitting
The secret of success for many Southeast Asian countries has been their choice of economic and diplomatic multilateralism. Fence-sitting between rival powers is becoming fraught. China inspires a degree of fear in the region, due to its clout and geographical proximity. And under Trump, the United States is on the offensive against the multilateral trade system, with major diplomatic consequences. Can Southeast Asian countries maintain their balance by embracing new partnerships?
Gulf Sovereign Wealth Funds: Major Actors in World Finance
The sovereign wealth funds of Gulf countries have become key players in world finance. By investing colossal sums in strategic sectors, they contribute both to local development and the growing influence of the Gulf monarchies in the global economy and international politics. In the near future, they will have to grapple with two challenges: that of human capital, and that of their geopolitical position between the Global North and Global South.