The Reform of NATO and the Free World’s Security Pact
Reforming the structure does not go to the heart of the problem. A new understanding has to be reached among the allies that takes into consideration the political, economic and technical changes of the last decade.
“We, the peoples of the United Nations, determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war ... to live together in peace with one another as good neighbors and to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security … have resolved to combine our efforts to accomplish these aims.”
Such are the core ideas behind the birth of the United Nations (UN) organization in June 1945. These ideas are the product of weariness and wariness about new wars breaking out, as well as of the realization that, in spite of divergences, the world is tending towards unity. Franklin D. Roosevelt, who had his own vision of this new interdependency, intended to establish its rules. Unfortunately, the UN organization and its Security Council proved inadequate in attempting to suppress or simply ease the mounting tension between the communist states and the Free World. Hence the profound deception that followed, since much hope had been placed in the United Nations. Faced with the frenzied aggressiveness of world communism – led by Moscow – it was becoming essential to equip the Free World with an efficient security system.
NATO’s purpose
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is the most important regional pact concluded within this system and the United States is the main protagonist behind the creation of this pact. Similar imperatives underlie the creation of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO), the Baghdad Pact (renamed the Central Treaty Organization, CENTO) and the security pact signed between the United States and Japan, as well as the United States’ intervention in Korea under the United Nations flag. In terms of Western policy, this system – one that is not closed on itself – is the practical consequence of the ‘containment’ policy. This ‘containment’ policy is the policy that all too easily replaced ‘rollback’ – the driving back, with varying degrees of violence, of world communism from the positions it had gained through strength or cunning. The containment policy, on the other hand, held steadfast against all attempts to replace it with a policy of retreat.
When the North Atlantic Treaty was signed on 4th April 1949, the Federal Republic of Germany did not yet exist, but the fact that the world was split into two was perhaps more obvious than it is 15 years later. […]
OUTLINE
- NATO’s purpose
- International changes and the transformation of NATO
- Burden-sharing, geographic limits and Alliance globalization
Eugen Gerstenmaier (1906-1986) distinguished himself by taking part in German resistance to Nazism through the Kreisau Circle, which was responsible for the attempted assassination of Hitler on 20th July 1944. He was a member of the German Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and President of the Bundestag between 1954 and 1969.
The paper is translated by Clémence Sebag.
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
The Reform of NATO and the Free World’s Security Pact
Author(s)
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
A New Path for Europe
The construction of the European Union is historically inseparable from the emergence, at the end of World War II, of an Atlantic world dominated by the United States. Successive enlargements and the revision of U.S. policy are undermining the concepts upon which the European Union has been built since the fall of the USSR. It is undoubtedly time to return to a path of more diverse groupings, corresponding to the levels of commitment and the interests of the states of the Old Continent.
How Technology Is Reshaping the World Order
The central role of technology in the competition between the major powers is fueling an ever-more intense rivalry. Artificial intelligence is enabling large corporations to accrue unprecedented power, with consequences for states and even for international conflict. However, states do have tools at their disposal to regulate these developments. In this international competition, Europe has a strong hand, but must be prepared to play its cards in order to create a new kind of international cooperation.
Reflections on A Darkening World
The system that emerged after the Second World War to regulate international relations is now moribund. Russia and China may have weakened it, but it seems that Donald Trump’s United States may deliver the fatal blow. The prevailing atmosphere is one of power struggles, and the rise of nationalisms is fraught with danger. The artificial intelligence revolution also needs to be factored into this equation, as it has a strong bearing on how much power different players can exert. In this respect, Europe must ensure it does not get left behind.
1936-2026: 90th Anniversary of the Journal "Politique étrangère"
Founded in 1936 and published by the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri), Politique étrangère, France’s longest-running journal of international relations, is set to publish a special issue in early June 2026. Bringing together leading contributors from France and abroad, this issue aims to offer a panorama of an uncertain world and its possible futures. In an unprecedented initiative, Politique étrangère will bring together a broad range of international contributions in an effort to capture an international scene that is at once open and fragmented in all its diversity and dynamism.