Finland: The Ally Who Came in from the Cold
Among all European countries, Finland is perhaps the one whose strategic culture and military model have changed the least since the end of the Cold War. Built after the end of the Second World War to deter a potential new Soviet invasion, this model enabled Finland to serve as an example of European rearmament.
With its few million inhabitants, Finland has thus established a culture of total defense that is rare in Europe, combining concern for food and energy self-sufficiency, the protection of the population, and the preservation of the conscription model to enable the country to defend itself.
Formalized in 2023, Finland's accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has profoundly transformed Finnish strategy, which is now part of a broader European alliance facing Russia. While the links between Helsinki and the Atlantic Alliance are in fact older, accession remained a major political taboo, with neutrality long perceived as a guarantee of peace. Finland can therefore now integrate into a larger military structure while maintaining a regional dynamic revitalized since 2022 through the Nordic Defence Cooperation (NORDEFCO).
From a military perspective, the Finnish armed forces were adapted from the outset to face a conflict with the Soviet, and later Russian, neighbor. The land forces are therefore structured around an extensive conscription model that makes the defense of the territory a matter for every citizen. More austere than most European forces, they seek to rely on their knowledge of the harsh Finnish environment to sustain an elastic defense if Russia attacks. For its part, the Finnish navy possesses limited means but retains rare naval mining capabilities to deny the adversary access to its coasts or even to isolate it at the end of the Gulf of Karelia. Moreover, modernizing the fleet and acquiring larger vessels could open new tactical opportunities. Finally, the Finnish air force relies on a logic of dispersal of its assets to guarantee its survival, a logic that could be called into question by the acquisition of F-35 fighter-bombers, which are far more complex to operate from improvised infrastructure.
Long-standing relations between Paris and Helsinki have intensified since the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine and France’s pivot to the East. This dynamic still needs to be confirmed over time, but it opens new prospects for the French armed forces. The multiplication of joint exercises across the different domains is, in this respect, an encouraging signal.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Finland: The Ally Who Came in from the Cold
Framework Nation: A European Challenge and French Ambition
First appearing in the early 2000s, the framework nation concept follows several distinct rationales, whether it refers to a country assuming the leadership of a military operation, directing a multinational capability project, or commanding a permanent force structure. In every case, the country that takes on this role fully intends to derive from it additional politico-military influence.
The Nuanced Relationship Between Public Opinion and Foreign Policy
Public sentiment is something decision-makers must contend with, especially in democratic states. However, the extent to which public opinion shapes foreign policy varies. Three Council of Councils experts in France, India, and Nigeria reflect on how public opinion does—and sometimes does not—affect foreign policy decisions.
Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?
Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?
How does France’s nuclear deterrent contribute to the defense of Europe?
France’s nuclear deterrent, serving first and foremost to defend France’s vital interests, also contributes to the defense of Europe. This contribution has been recognized within the North Atlantic Alliance since 1974, but remains little known. In a speech closely followed by France’s European partners and its adversaries alike, President Emmanuel Macron announced a new concept for French nuclear deterrence: “forward deterrence” (dissuasion avancée). This article aims to explain the origins of this concept, outline its main pillars, and describe the partnerships that are sought. It then discusses the relationship with the U.S. doctrine of “extended deterrence”, and finally offers some ethical considerations.