Finland: The Ally Who Came in from the Cold
Among all European countries, Finland is perhaps the one whose strategic culture and military model have changed the least since the end of the Cold War. Built after the end of the Second World War to deter a potential new Soviet invasion, this model enabled Finland to serve as an example of European rearmament.
With its few million inhabitants, Finland has thus established a culture of total defense that is rare in Europe, combining concern for food and energy self-sufficiency, the protection of the population, and the preservation of the conscription model to enable the country to defend itself.
Formalized in 2023, Finland's accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has profoundly transformed Finnish strategy, which is now part of a broader European alliance facing Russia. While the links between Helsinki and the Atlantic Alliance are in fact older, accession remained a major political taboo, with neutrality long perceived as a guarantee of peace. Finland can therefore now integrate into a larger military structure while maintaining a regional dynamic revitalized since 2022 through the Nordic Defence Cooperation (NORDEFCO).
From a military perspective, the Finnish armed forces were adapted from the outset to face a conflict with the Soviet, and later Russian, neighbor. The land forces are therefore structured around an extensive conscription model that makes the defense of the territory a matter for every citizen. More austere than most European forces, they seek to rely on their knowledge of the harsh Finnish environment to sustain an elastic defense if Russia attacks. For its part, the Finnish navy possesses limited means but retains rare naval mining capabilities to deny the adversary access to its coasts or even to isolate it at the end of the Gulf of Karelia. Moreover, modernizing the fleet and acquiring larger vessels could open new tactical opportunities. Finally, the Finnish air force relies on a logic of dispersal of its assets to guarantee its survival, a logic that could be called into question by the acquisition of F-35 fighter-bombers, which are far more complex to operate from improvised infrastructure.
Long-standing relations between Paris and Helsinki have intensified since the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine and France’s pivot to the East. This dynamic still needs to be confirmed over time, but it opens new prospects for the French armed forces. The multiplication of joint exercises across the different domains is, in this respect, an encouraging signal.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Finland: The Ally Who Came in from the Cold
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesTaking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?
Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?
How does France’s nuclear deterrent contribute to the defense of Europe?
France’s nuclear deterrent, serving first and foremost to defend France’s vital interests, also contributes to the defense of Europe. This contribution has been recognized within the North Atlantic Alliance since 1974, but remains little known. In a speech closely followed by France’s European partners and its adversaries alike, President Emmanuel Macron announced a new concept for French nuclear deterrence: “forward deterrence” (dissuasion avancée). This article aims to explain the origins of this concept, outline its main pillars, and describe the partnerships that are sought. It then discusses the relationship with the U.S. doctrine of “extended deterrence”, and finally offers some ethical considerations.
Fury from the Skies. A Strategic Analysis of Air Campaign against Iran
What is the outcome of Operations Roaring Lion (RL) and Epic Fury (EF), launched by Israel and the United States against the Islamic Republic of Iran on February 28, 2026?
Stability under Pressure. A Pakistani View on Nuclear Deterrence after Pahalgam
The May 2025 India-Pakistan crisis after the Pahalgam attack has generated a familiar but incomplete debate: did nuclear deterrence work, or did it merely allow both sides to fight a limited war under the nuclear shadow? The better answer is that deterrence worked at the level at which it was designed to work. It prevented a general war and an uncontrolled vertical escalation, and kept nuclear weapons in the background. But it did not prevent India from attempting to carve out space for conventional action, nor did it prevent Pakistan from responding conventionally to restore deterrence credibility.