Fiscal Policy in France and Germany: Insurmountable Differences?
The state of public finances in France and Germany is often compared. Germany is considered a model of rigor, through its ability to contain its deficits and generate surpluses, particularly between 2012 and 2019, thanks to the introduction into its constitution of a debt brake mechanism.
Conversely, France has a bad reputation, with a budget regularly in deficit since 1975. However, it was from the mid-2000s onwards that the budgetary trajectories of the two countries clearly diverged, which can be measured through the budget balance and the level of public debt.
However, in the context of multiple crises that Europe is experiencing since the euro zone crisis in 2010, until the Ukrainian war in 2022, including the Covid-19 pandemic, the consequences of the management of public debt translates differently in each country. The assessment should be more nuanced though with regard to the effects produced by the pursued political decisions:
On the German side, too little public investment is currently weighing on the quality of infrastructure, particularly in energy and transport, but also the operational level of the Bundeswehr. As a result, surpluses have amounted which were based on a growth model, highly exposed to international risks, and a reluctance to strengthen the coordination of economic policy at the European level.
As for France, its budgetary vulnerability has recently particularly accrued, marked by weak growth and a sharp increase in interest rates, after a long period of zero or even negative rates.
While the financing needs are considerable in both countries and in Europe as a whole, to complete the energy transition, relocate certain production and strengthen defense, what budgetary policy measures should Germany and France take? What are the possible points of convergence? Compromises are essential to ensure the reform of the Stability and Growth Pact and, beyond that, to ensure better governance of European economic policy.
- This note was written in partnership with the Jacques Delors Institute, a European think tank.
Dr. Andreas Eisl is a Research Fellow in European Economic Policy at the Jacques Delors Institute and an Associate Researcher at the Paris Institute for Policy Studies (Sciences Po).
This publication is also available in French and German (pdf):
FRENCH: Politique budgétaire en France et en Allemagne : des divergences insurmontables ?
GERMAN: „Unüberwindbare Divergenzen in der Haushaltspolitik Deutschlands und Frankreichs?“
Author(s)
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programs
The Study Committee on Franco-German Relations (Cerfa)
The Study Committee on Franco-German Relations (Cerfa) was created in 1954 by an inter-governmental agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and France, in order to raise awareness of Germany in France and analyze Franco-German relations, including in their European and international dimensions. In its conferences and seminars, which bring together experts, political leaders, senior decision-makers and representatives of civil society from both countries, Cerfa develops the Franco-German debate and stimulates political proposals. It regularly publishes studies through two collections: Cerfa notes and studies as well as Franco-German visions.
Cerfa maintains close relations with the network of German foundations and think tanks. In addition to its research and debate activities, Cerfa promotes the emergence of a new Franco-German generation through original cooperation programs. This is how in 2021-2022, Cerfa led a program on multilateralism with the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Paris. This program is aimed at young professionals from both countries interested in the issues of multilateralism in the context of their activities. It covered a wide range of themes relating to multilateralism, such as international trade, health, human rights and migration, non-proliferation and disarmament. Previously, Cerfa had participated in the Franco-German future dialogue, co-led with the DGAP from 2007 to 2020, and supported by the Robert Bosch Foundation and the Daniel Vernet group (formerly the Franco-German Reflection Group) which was founded in 2014 upon the initiative of the Genshagen Foundation.
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
Under construction: Europe’s economic repositioning in a fragmented international order
„Under Destruction“– this was this year’s motto at the Munich Security Conference. A motto that applies both to security and economy in an increasingly fragile international system. In 2024, Mario Draghi’s report on the EU’s competitiveness rang the alarm bell: Europe is slipping behind the US and China, European companies struggle with Brussels' bureaucracy, and the internal market is too fragmented. However, two years later only about 15 % of his recommendations were implemented: the wake-up call was not heard.
Germany in the Shadow of the United States, Russia, and China – Systemic Paradigm Shifts
Since reunification, Germany has built its prosperity on an international order based on free trade, multilateralism, and geopolitical stability. This model relied on three relationships considered complementary: U.S. military protection, Russian energy supplies, and economic integration with China. For several decades, Berlin viewed these interdependencies as factors contributing to peace, growth, and security.
France and EU Enlargement: From Strategic Hesitation to a Geopolitical Shift
Paris has come a long way in its approach to enlarging the European Union. However, French support remains fragile, due in part to a lack of public support.
Reviving the German Economy: Balancing Economic, Social, and Defense Priorities
Germany is facing fundamental challenges to its economic and social model and is seeking a new course. The German post-war model was hugely successful, leading to economic strength and prosperity over many decades, but now it is steadily faltering. The previously latent fear of deindustrialization is becoming more concrete, particularly due to the weakening of a key sector: the automotive industry.