The Future of Think Tanks
In this special issue of Politique étrangère devoted to the proceedings of the conference organized by Ifri on April 10, 2019, in the Grand Amphitheater of the Sorbonne, on the occasion of its fortieth anniversary, discover the debate moderated by Bassma Kodmani between Thomas Bagger, Thomas Gomart, Robin Niblett, and Daniela Schwarzer.
Bassma Kodmani
We will talk about the role of think tanks, their uncertainties and their future. Any leader of a think tank wonders each day about what they must do to preserve its credibility, independence and influence. Do you think that we, the think tank community, are doing something; and also, what? And if a think tank's role is to make international questions intelligible and to recommend a certain number of directions for political decision-making, my first question would be the following: how explain to politicians that it is in their interest to work with think tanks? This is an even more important question now that we are dealing with political leaders for whom the world of think tanks is not presumably of crucial interest...
Who listens to think tanks?
Robin Niblett
What Bruno Le Maire said this morning, quoting Xi Jinping, who noted that the Europeans had taken three centuries to build what the Chinese built in forty years, particularly struck me. The most difficult thing is to think about the future of think tanks. We are now experiencing a proliferation of think tanks around the world (more than 1,000 in the United States and more than 500 in China...), which seem to be experiencing a golden age. They seem necessary because we are in a turbulent world. And yet, the paradox is that we are uncertain of our credibility in our role. Normally, our main public is governments and governing elites in the private and public sectors. We are making forecasts and the most objective analyses possible; we are trying to give advice, which is sometimes difficult because we are not elected – but we can also sometimes say what others cannot say... Governments are now, doubtless, paying less attention to what we are saying because they live in a media world where the news dominates every moment (see the example of Brexit).
How can we prove the importance of think tanks to governments today? We need to show that we are in contact with spheres that the government does not necessarily reach. We could also communicate via the media. But the public also looks at us in a somewhat skeptical manner, as a number of us are seen as managers of globalization, illustrating the positive sides of it without seeing the dangers. Hence, the public's skepticism can be combined with a lack of government attention. We can naturally assert ourselves by renewing major themes of the international debate, by developing multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary studies, by involving more individuals, NGOs, and various partners. […]
Thomas Bagger is Director of Foreign Policy in the Office of the Federal President (Federal Republic of Germany)
Thomas Gomart is Director of Ifri
Robin Niblett is Director of the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA, Chatham House, London)
Daniela Schwarzer is Director of the Deutsche Geselschaft für Auswärtige Politik (DGAP, Berlin)
Bassma Kodmani is Director of the Arab Reform Initiative
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
The Future of Think Tanks
Find out more
Discover all our analysesA New Path for Europe
The construction of the European Union is historically inseparable from the emergence, at the end of World War II, of an Atlantic world dominated by the United States. Successive enlargements and the revision of U.S. policy are undermining the concepts upon which the European Union has been built since the fall of the USSR. It is undoubtedly time to return to a path of more diverse groupings, corresponding to the levels of commitment and the interests of the states of the Old Continent.
How Technology Is Reshaping the World Order
The central role of technology in the competition between the major powers is fueling an ever-more intense rivalry. Artificial intelligence is enabling large corporations to accrue unprecedented power, with consequences for states and even for international conflict. However, states do have tools at their disposal to regulate these developments. In this international competition, Europe has a strong hand, but must be prepared to play its cards in order to create a new kind of international cooperation.
Reflections on A Darkening World
The system that emerged after the Second World War to regulate international relations is now moribund. Russia and China may have weakened it, but it seems that Donald Trump’s United States may deliver the fatal blow. The prevailing atmosphere is one of power struggles, and the rise of nationalisms is fraught with danger. The artificial intelligence revolution also needs to be factored into this equation, as it has a strong bearing on how much power different players can exert. In this respect, Europe must ensure it does not get left behind.
1936-2026: 90th Anniversary of the Journal "Politique étrangère"
Founded in 1936 and published by the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri), Politique étrangère, France’s longest-running journal of international relations, is set to publish a special issue in early June 2026. Bringing together distinguished French and international contributors, this issue aims to provide an overview of an uncertain world and its possible futures. In an unprecedented undertaking, Politique étrangère brings together a wide range of international contributions in an effort to grasp a global landscape that is at once open and fragmented, in all its diversity and dynamism. Through in-depth analyses of cross-cutting challenges, reflections on methods and structures of governance, and projections into futures feared or envisioned by creators from around the world—ranging from alternative histories to speculative thought experiments—the various approaches complement and challenge one another, opening up broad avenues for reflection.