NATO: A View from Central Europe
Poland is not just concerned with the usefulness of the Alliance, but also with what can be done to make it more effective, and to maintain its relevance and good health in the decades ahead.
This is a unique moment to address North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) issues, mainly because anniversaries celebrated in the course of 2009 are clearly of particular importance for both the Alliance and Poland.
In March, we had the tenth anniversary of the wave of NATO enlargement that embraced Poland. In May, five years had elapsed since Poland’s accession to the European Union. Then, at the Strasbourg/Kehl summit, the allies celebrated the 60th anniversary of NATO’s foundation. They also took the important decision to develop a new Strategic Concept. Thus, at the next meeting of heads of state and government in Lisbon, NATO may be provided with a new strategic framework, reflecting changes in the security environment and adjusting the Alliance to current requirements. The ambition of Warsaw, as with other capitals, is to actively co-shape the new document. This ambition is well illustrated by the fact that the former Polish minister of foreign affairs, Adam D. Rotfeld, is a member of the group of ‘wise men’ that is to prepare an initial draft of the new Strategic Concept.
In this anniversary year, it is fair to state that NATO’s achievements in recent years should be perceived in terms of a success story. It is beyond doubt that NATO remains the main pillar of member states’ security and defense, providing them with effective and credible security guarantees. The Alliance remains viable through the process of internal adaptation, continued enlargement and the development of relations with all partners that contribute to its efforts in key regions to ensure Euro-Atlantic security.
Over recent years, NATO has also become an important instrument for providing security and stabilization even in the remote regions of the world. It has effectively adapted to new security requirements and is preparing for threats and challenges of a less conventional nature.
During the last decade, Poland, as one of the Central European states, has significantly contributed to such changes in NATO by proving to be “a good and credible ally in fair weather or foul” and by demonstrating a proper understanding of the necessary balance of rights and obligations required from members of the organization. That is why, in the current strategic debate, Poland does not focus on the question of whether or not NATO is still needed but rather on what should be done to make it even more effective and how to keep the Alliance in good shape in the decades ahead. […]
OUTLINE
- NATO in the 21st century
- The transatlantic link
- Enlargement
- Keep Russia in
Bogdan Klich is Defense Minister of the Polish Republic.
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
NATO: A View from Central Europe
Iran: Anatomy of a Power at War
The elimination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and several high-ranking officials at the outset of the 2026 American-Israeli operation did not succeed in bringing down the Iranian regime. The regime had prepared for such a scenario, notably by decentralizing its structures. Moreover, it continues to adapt to war. The power of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is growing at the expense of the Shiite clergy. The security apparatus defends the country’s sovereignty and justifies its actions in the name of raison d’état.
“Remodeling” the Middle East?
Chaos continues to spread, seemingly without end, across the Middle East. The Israeli-American attack on Iran has resulted in a clear military and diplomatic failure, but it is paving the way for a regional realignment, the consequences of which remain uncertain. New regional groupings are taking shape, either centered around Israel or built on the prospect of coexistence with Tehran, alongside a decline in American influence and the marginalization of Europe, while China maintains a low-key presence.
Silicon Valley and War: Lessons from Ukraine
Over the course of international conflicts, and particularly in Ukraine, major tech companies have emerged as central actors. Initially subject to wartime maneuvering, they have since become decisive actors in their own right, privatizing a significant share of wartime exchanges, shaping the information flows of societies, and presenting themselves as providers of security. This situation raises important questions about states’ autonomy in making decisions and taking action.
Does Artificial Intelligence Change the Nature of War?
From Gaza to Ukraine and Iran, current conflicts are being shaped by the arrival of artificial intelligence and robots on the battlefield. The changes under way are so profound that humans risk rapidly losing control over entire aspects of the conduct of military operations. While these technological developments are altering the character of war, their impact on the very nature of war itself remains a matter of debate.