Search on Ifri.org

About Ifri

Frequent searches

Suggestions

The U.S. Policy Toward Taiwan Beyond Donald Trump: Mapping the American Stakeholders of U.S.-Taiwan Relations

Memos
|
Date de publication
|
Image de couverture de la publication
Image de couverture
Accroche

Donald Trump’s return to the White House reintroduced acute uncertainty into the security commitment of the United States (U.S.) to Taiwan. Unlike President Joe Biden, who repeatedly stated the determination to defend Taiwan, President Trump refrains from commenting on the hypothetical U.S. response in the context of a cross-Strait crisis.

Image principale
Taiwanese and American flags displayed together at an Asian alliance festival
Taiwanese and American flags displayed together at an Asian alliance festival (Honolulu, HI – January 25, 2025)
John Hanson Pye/Shutterstock.com
Table of contents
Table of contents

Titre
Key takeways

1
Policy uncertainty and volatility
Texte courant

Over the past year, the Trump 2 administration brought back uncertainty and volatility in U.S. foreign policy, including vis-à-vis China and Taiwan. Trump has used harsh language about Taiwan and often seems to prioritize a trade deal with Beijing over Taiwan’s security.

2
The role of government agencies
Texte courant

Yet unpacking the U.S. policy toward Taiwan reveals that Donald Trump is not the only stakeholder. First, besides the president, government agencies have proved consistent in sustaining political and military cooperation with Taiwan.

3
The role of Congress
Texte courant

Congress remains the most reliable institution upholding closer cooperation with Taiwan, advancing bipartisan laws that expand defense, energy, and space cooperation.

4
American tech companies
Texte courant

The American tech giants have expanded investments in Taiwan’s semiconductor, AI, and cloud ecosystem, embedding U.S. technological competitiveness in Taiwan.

5
A broad consensus in support of Taiwan
Texte courant

Ultimately, whether Donald Trump is genuinely interested in Taiwan’s security or not, there are heavy counterweights in the U.S. and a wide consensus in Congress and industry in support of Taiwan.

body

Trump's only comments—very debatable and largely unfounded—have consisted of assessing that “China doesn’t want to do that [i.e., invade Taiwan]”, and quoting Xi Jinping during a phone call as saying, for instance: “He told me, ‘I will never do it as long as you’re president’.” In addition, he has harshly criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the American semiconductor industry, and pressured Taiwanese industries to invest ever more in the U.S. While there is no evidence of Trump’s intention to abandon Taiwan, or bargaining it away for a trade deal with Beijing as some have anticipated, the question of whether the U.S. would intervene if Beijing attempted forcible unification with Taiwan looms larger than at any point in the recent decades.

Yet, focusing exclusively on presidential rhetoric risks overlooking the deeper structural forces shaping U.S.-Taiwan relations. The U.S. policy toward Taiwan is sustained not only by the president but also by a wider, more complex system of stakeholders, including executive agencies, Congress, as well as the American industrial technological base. This Memo aims to make sense of the U.S. policy on Taiwan by mapping these different stakeholders and drawing perspectives on the future of U.S.-Taiwan relations under Trump.

Download the full analysis

This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.

The U.S. Policy Toward Taiwan Beyond Donald Trump: Mapping the American Stakeholders of U.S.-Taiwan Relations

Decoration
Author(s)
Photo
Marc JULIENNE

Marc JULIENNE

Intitulé du poste

Director, Center for Asian Studies, Ifri

Image principale
Asia Map
Center for Asian Studies
Accroche centre

Asia is a nerve center for multiple global economic, political and security challenges. The Center for Asian Studies provides documented expertise and a platform for discussion on Asian issues to accompany decision makers and explain and contextualize developments in the region for the sake of a larger public dialogue.

The Center's research is organized along two major axes: relations between Asia's major powers and the rest of the world; and internal economic and social dynamics of Asian countries. The Center's research focuses primarily on China, Japan, India, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific, but also covers Southeast Asia, the Korean peninsula and the Pacific Islands. 

The Centre for Asian Studies maintains close institutional links with counterpart research institutes in Europe and Asia, and its researchers regularly carry out fieldwork in the region.

The Center organizes closed-door roundtables, expert-level seminars and a number of public events, including an Annual Conference, that welcome experts from Asia, Europe and the United States. The work of Center’s researchers, as well as that of their partners, is regularly published in the Center’s electronic journal Asie.Visions.

China’s Strategy Toward Pacific Island countries: Countering Taiwan and Western Influence

Date de publication
07 January 2026
Accroche

Over the past decade, China has deployed a diplomatic strategy toward the Pacific Island Countries (PICs). This strategy pursues two main objectives: countering Taiwan's diplomatic influence in the region and countering the influence of liberal democracies in what Beijing refers to as the "Global South."

Image de couverture de la publication
Page de couverture - Opening Up the G7 - M. JULIENNE

Opening up the G7 to South Korea to Address Contemporary Global Challenges

Date de publication
19 November 2025
Accroche

The G7’s global influence has diminished as powers like China reshape international governance through initiatives such as BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). With the G7 now representing just 10 per cent of the world’s population and 28 per cent of global GDP, its relevance is increasingly questioned.

Image principale

Expanding SPDMM as a pivotal institution in the Pacific – A French perspective

Date de publication
17 October 2025
Accroche

The South Pacific Defence Ministers’ Meeting (SPDMM) is the only forum that brings together defense ministers from the wider South Pacific — including Chile, which is hosting it for the first time. This heterogeneous group of countries with varying resources, capacities, and interests — Australia, Chile, Fiji, France, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea (PNG), and Tonga — are united by their shared determination to strengthen cooperation on maritime security and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR) activities.

Image principale

EU’s Derisking From China: A Daunting Task

Date de publication
09 October 2025
Accroche

With economic security as a major concern, the EU has recently turned to “derisking” from China. The EU strategy entails reducing critical dependencies and vulnerabilities, including in EU supply chains, and diversifying where necessary, while recognizing the importance and need to maintain open channels of communication.

Page image credits
Taiwanese and American flags displayed together at an Asian alliance festival (Honolulu, HI – January 25, 2025)
John Hanson Pye/Shutterstock.com

How can this study be cited?

Image de couverture de la publication
Image de couverture
The U.S. Policy Toward Taiwan Beyond Donald Trump: Mapping the American Stakeholders of U.S.-Taiwan Relations, from Ifri by
Copy
Image de couverture de la publication
Image de couverture

The U.S. Policy Toward Taiwan Beyond Donald Trump: Mapping the American Stakeholders of U.S.-Taiwan Relations