Innovation Policy Challenges for Japan: An Open and Global Strategy
Productivity is increasingly important in the Japanese economy as an aging and shrinking population is expected to constrain labor input. Thus, the creation of innovation is critical for realizing economic growth and maintaining Japan's international competitiveness. Specifically, emerging countries such as China and South Korea are quickly catching up on Japan's level of technological prowess in electronics and other high-tech industries. For that reason, continual investment in R&D and provision of products and services that are competitive in the global market are crucial for Japan's international competitiveness.
As such competition heats up in the field of innovation, accelerating the speed of product development is becoming a vital issue for Japanese companies. At the same time, broadening the scope of R&D is also essential so as to keep up with increasingly complex products and systems that have developed as the result of technological advances. This paper examines the future of Japanese companies, with a particular focus on the "opening" and globalization of innovation that is critical to their international competitiveness.
This article also presents an overview of the policy challenges of the Japanese government in the area of a network-based innovation system. In Japan, the national innovation system is characterized by large companies, with substantial in-house R&D resources, dominating private R&D expenditure, while R&D collaboration between companies and universities is lacking. However, there is an increasing trend of R&D collaboration, particularly among small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The Japanese government has also taken several policy actions to facilitate such open innovation activities, in the hope that they spread nationwide to include large companies.
What is vital for Japanese firms is to incorporate into their technology management both of the key elements - maintaining expansive R&D activities that do not sacrifice future growth potential through open innovation, and breaking into new growth markets through "globalization".
Available in:
Regions and themes
ISBN / ISSN
Share
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Innovation Policy Challenges for Japan: An Open and Global Strategy
China’s Climate Leadership after Hormuz: How Should Europe Adjust?
The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz in early 2026 offered an unplanned stress test of China’s approach to energy security, and China passed it far better than most expected. The episode demonstrated that the underlying risk of supply disruption is real, while validating a preference for resilience and resource security that has long underpinned Chinese energy and climate policy and has now been reinforced under the banner of building an “energy powerhouse.”
China as an ambivalent supporter of the WTO and the multilateral trading system
Amid rising trade tensions between Europe and China and broader uncertainty in the international rules-based trade regime, Beijing has worked to preserve and bolster the multilateral trading system while at the same time failing to reform the domestic policies that have served to undermine that same system.
Pakistan and the Israel-Palestine Conflict: Transformation in Pakistan’s Approach After the War in Gaza
Pakistan has long combined vocal support for the Palestinian cause with covert engagement with Israel. Since the war in Gaza, this balance has become untenable: public opinion is united against Israel, joining Trump’s Board of Peace has drawn rare cross-party criticism, and new regional alignments put normalization out of reach.
The Oceania Factor in France’s Evolving Indo-Pacific Strategy
This paper examines the two-way relationship between France’s Indo-Pacific strategy and developments in Oceania. Oceania was not a priority in the initial years of France’s Indo-Pacific strategy, as the region was largely treated as secondary to major strategic hotspots and key partnerships, while overseas territories were primarily handled as domestic issues and recipients of a top-down strategy.