Minnesota: understanding national issues through a territorial lens
Located in the heart of a mostly Republican Midwest, Minnesota stood out in the 2016 presidential election, with Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton winning 46.5 % of the vote, in keeping with the State’s Democratic tradition. In the 2020 presidential campaign Minnesota has been a battleground state, as President Trump and Joe Biden are both intent on winning its 10 votes in the Electoral College.
It has also been presented as a possible swing state within the Heartland.
To shed light on what is at stake in Minnesota, this paper shows that taking into account local realities helps gain deeper insight into dynamics at work nationally.
Building on existing literature and interviews conducted locally, we highlight Minnesota’s political, economic, social and institutional specificities. Particular emphasis is placed on institutions established to foster redistributive policies and regulate urban development.
However, as in many other states, the past few years have seen a deepening of the urban-rural divide — here pitting the dynamic Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area vs. Greater Minnesota, and of racial and social inequalities.
This content is available in French : Le Minnesota : comprendre les enjeux nationaux au prisme des territoires.
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesBrazil One Year Away from the October 2026 General Elections
Brazil’s general elections will be held on October 4, 2026, to elect the president, vice-president, members of the National Congress, governors, deputy governors and state legislative assemblies. For the presidential and gubernatorial elections, a second round will be held on October 25 if no candidate obtains a majority of the votes in the first round.
Trump II: The Clash of Ideologies
The second Trump administration brings together a number of very different, even opposing, ideologies: far-right populism, the reactionary Christian right, paleolibertarianism, and technolibertarianism. The most visible measures taken since Donald Trump's return to the White House have been populist in nature, with the president's authority strengthened, checks and balances weakened, a form of identity politics embraced, and economic nationalism implemented.
Water in Mexico: an Emergency that Will Wait
Access to water is already and will become increasingly problematic for Mexican economic actors due to the progressive scarcity of the resource resulting from climate change, a geographical distribution that does not coincide with that of the population or economic activity, and management that has so far been far too lax.
Donald Trump v. the States: the Case of New York
While the disruptive policies of the second Trump administration are being implemented at the federal level and on the international stage, they are also being felt in the federal states and major cities across the country. In the spring of 2025, several cases involving the state and city of New York demonstrate that the president’s attacks on environmental protection, the separation of powers, freedom of speech, etc., are also being carried out at the local level.