Reviving the German Economy: Balancing Economic, Social, and Defense Priorities
Germany is facing fundamental challenges to its economic and social model and is seeking a new course. The German post-war model was hugely successful, leading to economic strength and prosperity over many decades, but now it is steadily faltering. The previously latent fear of deindustrialization is becoming more concrete, particularly due to the weakening of a key sector: the automotive industry.
Germany’s industrial competitiveness is declining, and its export power is weakened by Chinese competition and American pressure.
The deteriorating geopolitical context is further exacerbating the situation of Germany’s weakening industrial performance. The Zeitenwende, initiated by the “traffic light” coalition government, already signaled an awareness of Germany’s vulnerability in a context where realpolitik prevails and where dependencies can be used for coercion (dependency on energy in relation to Russia, security and defense in relation to the United States, and economic dependency in relation to China).
The arrival of Friedrich Merz’s government signifies the return of the Conservatives to the Chancellorship, but as part of a coalition with the Social Democrats, thus necessitating compromises and trade-offs. Easing Germany’s “debt brake,” establishing a Special Fund for Infrastructure and Climate Neutrality (Sondervermögen für Infrastruktur und Klimaneutralität, SVIK) for the next twelve years, and deploying resources in the military sphere have given the new government leeway to revitalize the country’s economy.
However, difficult trade-offs must be made between priorities in terms of competitiveness, which raise questions about the German economic model; the preservation of social achievements, which are intended to maintain the German post-war model of prosperity; and defense imperatives, which require a significant effort by Germany to catch up militarily in light of the threats facing Europe. Germany’s repositioning is taking place in a context in which it is torn between expectations for domestic policy and those at the European level.
In this context, it must be asked how Germany can reconcile these numerous imperatives and find the appropriate levels of government intervention. While it is necessary to make structural decisions to maintain and strengthen Germany’s industrial base, already severely tested by external shocks, Germany is also increasingly called upon to lead at the European level. Can it succeed on both fronts?
Marie Krpata works as a Research Fellow at the Study Committee on Franco-German Relations (Cerfa) at the French Institute of International Relations, Ifri
This publication is also available in French: « Redémarrer l’économie allemande : entre impératifs économiques, sociaux et de défense ».
> Explore all of Ifri's analyses and news on Germany.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Reviving the German Economy: Balancing Economic, Social, and Defense Priorities
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesFrance-Germany: Overcoming Differences to Strengthen European Sovereignty
The Franco-German “reset” launched with Friedrich Merz’s appointment as Chancellor in May 2025 and given concrete form at the Franco-German Council of Ministers (FGCM) in Toulon in August 2025 was intended to address the structural challenges affecting the bilateral relationship. Yet it is clear that these ambitions have only been partially translated into concrete action. Since the beginning of 2026, Franco-German relations have entered a phase in which short-term challenges have combined with deeper divergences over priorities, policy approaches, and strategic culture.
Under construction: Europe’s economic repositioning in a fragmented international order
„Under Destruction“– this was this year’s motto at the Munich Security Conference. A motto that applies both to security and economy in an increasingly fragile international system. In 2024, Mario Draghi’s report on the EU’s competitiveness rang the alarm bell: Europe is slipping behind the US and China, European companies struggle with Brussels' bureaucracy, and the internal market is too fragmented. However, two years later only about 15 % of his recommendations were implemented: the wake-up call was not heard.
Germany in the Shadow of the United States, Russia, and China – Systemic Paradigm Shifts
Since reunification, Germany has built its prosperity on an international order based on free trade, multilateralism, and geopolitical stability. This model relied on three relationships considered complementary: U.S. military protection, Russian energy supplies, and economic integration with China. For several decades, Berlin viewed these interdependencies as factors contributing to peace, growth, and security.
France and EU Enlargement: From Strategic Hesitation to a Geopolitical Shift
Paris has come a long way in its approach to enlarging the European Union. However, French support remains fragile, due in part to a lack of public support.