The United States’ Strategy for Securing Critical Minerals Supplies: Can It Meet the Needs of the IRA?
The United States (US) reliance on foreign supplies of raw and processed critical minerals is pressing Washington to devise a strategy to secure short-, medium- and long-term solutions. Pressure only increased with the booming demand spurred partly by the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA) policies.
The US goal to become carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035 and reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 requires a complete overhaul of the structure of critical minerals production and supplies within the country as well as abroad to meet future demand and build resilience from China. This Memo assesses recent progress and whether it can help deliver on the IRA provisions.
To secure its critical mineral supplies, the US remains dependent from foreign countries. Graphite, manganese and many rare earth elements (REEs) are, indeed, rare occurrences in the country while deposits of nickel or cobalt are dwarfed by the giants in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia, or the Philippines.
With the aim of reducing these dependencies, the IRA, established in 2022, adopts a nationalistic approach to mineral sourcing by requiring a market-value based target for critical mineral content to benefit from its tax credits.
Thus, by 2027, to benefit from these tax credits, an electric vehicle should be built at 80% of the market value of critical minerals in its battery sourced domestically or from US free-trade partners (FTA). With a dependency on imports from non-FTA countries of 77% for cobalt and 46% for lithium and nickel, the IRA goals appear less than likely to be achieved.
This requirement of having 80% of the market value coming from an FTA-country or from the US, coupled with the “foreign entities of concern” provision in US legislation could significantly disrupt critical minerals supplies for US battery and car manufacturers.
On the domestic field, the US is trying to develop its own mining production, with three possible options:
- The opening of new mines, supported by the White House and the Department of Energy.
- The reprocessing of mine wastes, with around 100 000 abandoned mines in the US, whose exploitation often focused on a single ore.
- The recovery of byproducts from operating mines, whose potential strongly depends on economic considerations and on technical feasibility.
Each of these three options presents potential benefits and risks. Added to this are the difficulties of quickly obtaining operating permits, for which a waiting period of 7 to 10 years is often necessary. Moreover, social opposition to these new openings is generally strong.
Finally, US recycling capacity is still limited, and is not a significant enough source of metals to enable a real overhaul of US consumption systems.
Therefore, these domestic and external mining and refining efforts, even coupled with a push for recycling industries, face significant hurdles and are unlikely to reorganize critical minerals supply chains in the short term, thus jeopardizing the goals set out in the IRA. Under its current material requirements, the law is unlikely to be fulfilled, and only a softening of its sourcing rules could align with the geological and geopolitical realities of critical minerals production.
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
The United States’ Strategy for Securing Critical Minerals Supplies: Can It Meet the Needs of the IRA?
Center for Energy & Climate
Ifri's Energy and Climate Center carries out activities and research on the geopolitical and geoeconomic issues of energy transitions such as energy security, competitiveness, control of value chains, and acceptability. Specialized in the study of European energy/climate policies as well as energy markets in Europe and around the world, its work also focuses on the energy and climate strategies of major powers such as the United States, China or India. It offers recognized expertise, enriched by international collaborations and events, particularly in Paris and Brussels.
Mining Nationalism and Export Restrictions: The Challenges of Economic Development
Since the end of the 2000s and especially the 2010s, resource nationalism has been on the rise.
Solar Radiation Management: A Climate Tool with Geopolitical Implications
The Paris Agreement (2015) aims to keep global warming below 2 °C, preferably 1.5 °C, above pre-industrial levels. Mitigation (reducing greenhouse gas emissions) remains the core tool for reaching net carbon neutrality by mid-century. However, a temperature overshoot is anticipated. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) forecasts that the 1.5 °C threshold will be exceeded in the coming years, with warming potentially peaking between 2.2 °C and 3.6 °C this century. Against this backdrop, three trends characterize the climate policy debate.
China’s Hydrogen Economy Five Years On
China’s hydrogen sector is not new. It is the world’s largest industrial hydrogen system, rooted in ammonia, methanol, refining, coal chemicals and by-product gas streams.
27 Plans for 2027: Turning the Electrification Action Plan into National Action
With the aim of structurally reducing the European economy’s dependence on fossil fuel imports and accelerating the energy transition, the European Commission has opted for electrification.