Solar Photovoltaic Energy Policy in Europe: Losing Sight of What is Right: Current Developments and Lessons Learned for Policymakers and Industry
Europe has set ambitious but drastic targets in order to fight climate change. The 20-20-20 objectives demonstrate this. By 2020, emissions are to be reduced by 20%, the share of renewable energy sources (RES) in energy consumption is targeted to rise to 20%, and energy efficiency is planned to increase by 20% in comparison to the 1990 levels in Europe.
In order for Europe to reach these objectives, national targets for each Member State have been set. While not yet officially binding, the 2050 Roadmap of the Commission is focused on achieving even stronger reductions, namely a reduction of 80% in emissions compared to 1990 levels. The 2020 objectives account for less than half of these 2050 objectives.
Consequently, Member States are currently under pressure to formulate efforts seriously to comply with their national and European targets as part of the objective of sustainability. European countries have increased capacity of renewables: hydroelectric power, wind power, biomass and solar energy are increasingly produced. As part of the planned renewable electricity capacities for 2020, solar photovoltaic panels (PVs) are the third largest installed RES source, after hydroelectric capacity and wind capacity.
PV is an interesting renewable source for several reasons. First, PV uses an energy source which is available daily: the sun. Secondly, PV has shown positive cost and efficiency improvements over time, which makes it increasingly interesting from a business perspective. It is assumed that PV will provide electricity at competitive prices soon in some countries. Thirdly, PV is one of the few domestically usable applications for electricity generation. This might shift the position of consumers to being co-producers or so-called prosumers. These are a few of the reasons that explain the interest in analyzing efforts linked to PV.
From an industrial point of view, PV panels are produced in-and outside Europe. Looking from a European perspective, it is interesting to examine China and the United States in regard to PV manufacturing and installation capacity. China may be characterized by its high and early PV production, exporting almost 90% of its output. What will this and other developments mean for European PV industry and job creation?
At present, the deployment of PV is under much discussion in many countries, within and outside of Europe. Changes in Feed-in-Tariffs (FIT) are following each other closely and motivations behind deployment are presently frequently discussed in the political sphere. Still, there are important points to consider. What are the costs of PV? How are the costs expected to decrease and how effective are current policies concerning PV penetration? Are these policies also effective in eventually reaching the CO2 reduction targets? PV technologies are still developing and it is important to not be moved by assumptions on efficiencies or effectiveness of the technology.
The aim of this report is to provide recommendations for the debate concerning PV deployment in Europe and to provide suggestions for both policymakers and industry in- and outside of Europe. This is done by analyzing the main developments related to PV worldwide. The report will furthermore present technical developments of PV and will present a comparison in the international context with US and Asia.
In Section 2, the position of PV policy is given within the EU renewable projections for 2020. Before continuing with the support policies for PV in Section 4, the main developments in PV technologies with definitions are provided in Section 3. Afterwards, case studies of the five major European countries with the largest European installed capacities in PV are presented with their efforts and policies associated to PV in Section 5. In Section 6, an evaluation of the European Policy is presented, after which a brief review of the US and China and their PV industries is given with their policy incentives to increase PV installation in Section 7. Finally, this report ends with a conclusion in Section 5, providing the recommendations for policymakers and industries in a global context.
This study only focuses on Solar Photovoltaics, and not on Thermal Solar energy (which uses the heat to generate electricity). Additionally, the reader should be warned that FIT and PV connected regulation is constantly changing. Due to this, data given might not all be totally up to date when this report is published.
Available in:
Regions and themes
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Solar Photovoltaic Energy Policy in Europe: Losing Sight of What is Right: Current Developments and Lessons Learned for Policymakers and Industry
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesNorway’s Energy Policy Dilemmas and Debates: In or Out?
2026 may prove to be the end of the Norwegian exception. Norway has long prided itself on the successful combination of fossil fuel extraction with a strong social democracy.
The US’s Critical Mineral Offensive Strategy: How Can Europe Step Up?
As Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) economies are confronted with mounting threats to critical raw materials (CRM) supplies, resolute interventionist policies are needed to build resilient value chains.
Financial Tools for Boosting Resilience of CRM Value Chains and Strategic Stockpiling
Critical Raw Material (CRM) value chains are more vulnerable than ever and entire vital industries in Europe are now at risk if supplies are not secured through strategic and urgent actions, given mounting geopolitical confrontation, resource nationalism, growing demand and limited supply increase.
Placing the EU on a Warfare Footing: Energy and Raw Materials Priorities for 2026
The year 2025 has confirmed that one must prepare for much worse in the field of geopolitics and geoeconomics as the intensity and frequency of shocks increase and as the European Union (EU) has no more stable flanks now that crises with the United States (US) become so frequent and reveal a systemic rift. In the world, barriers to trade multiply and dependencies are weaponized.