Taiwan's Energy Supply: The Achilles Heel of National Security
Making Taiwan a “dead island” through “a blockade” and “disruption of energy supplies” leading to an “economic collapse.” This is how Colonel Zhang Chi of the People’s Liberation Army and professor at the National Defense University in Beijing described the objective of the Chinese military exercises in May 2024, following the inauguration of Taiwan’s new president, Lai Ching-te. Similar to the exercises that took place after Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taipei in August 2022, China designated exercise zones facing Taiwan’s main ports, effectively simulating a military embargo on Taiwan. These maneuvers illustrate Beijing’s growing pressure on the island, which it aims to conquer, and push Taiwan to question its resilience capacity.
Taiwan, an island the size of Belgium but with a population as large as Australia’s (23 million people), has an insular energy system, with an isolated electrical grid. This grid powers one of the world’s most densely populated areas and energy-intensive high-tech industries, concentrated to the west of a massive central mountain range that runs from north to south. Moreover, Taiwan includes several islands that must rely on their own energy supply, particularly Kinmen and Matsu, two islands located just a few kilometers off the Chinese coast.
To meet these energy needs, Taiwan’s energy mix relies primarily on fossil fuels (natural gas and coal). This dependence will persist after the complete phase-out of nuclear power in 2025 (a commitment made by the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] when it came to power in 2016), despite the rapid development of renewable energies.
In the context of regional tensions, energy supply represents a true Achilles’ heel for Taiwan’s national security. With 96% of its energy imported, the island is highly vulnerable to an embargo or disruption of maritime traffic. Additionally, fuel storage capacity is limited, as evidenced by the legal reserve of only eight days for liquefied natural gas (LNG). The location of major above-ground gas and oil storage tanks in western Taiwan, along with key power plants and the distribution network, increases the exposure of the energy system in the event of a military attack such as a bombing.
Aware of the challenge, the Taiwanese government is working to strengthen its energy independence, for example by encouraging the development of renewable energies, diversifying fossil fuel suppliers, increasing fuel storage capacities, and enhancing the security of the power grid.
However, the government struggles to formulate an energy policy that explicitly aligns with national security needs. Energy policy is nonetheless inseparable from national security, especially as the confidence of the Taiwanese people in their defense capabilities remains mixed. The sector also suffers from a fragmentation of responsibilities between private actors, the government, and state-owned enterprises, leading to inadequate investment strategies. It must also contend with other imperatives, such as the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the need to produce cheap electricity for the industrial sector.
This study is based on open sources as well as numerous interviews with industry players, experts, and political representatives conducted between May and July 2024 in Taipei.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Taiwan's Energy Supply: The Achilles Heel of National Security
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesChina’s EV Rise and the Strategic Challenge for Japan’s Automotive Industry
China’s rapid expansion in electric vehicle production is reshaping global automotive competition for both European and Japanese automakers. Japan —a pioneer in hybrid vehicles— is struggling to translate this leadership into battery electric vehicles (BEVs), as Chinese manufacturers rapidly scale production and exports. At the same time, China’s dominance in battery manufacturing and critical mineral processing exposes upstream vulnerabilities for Japan’s automotive industry. Together, these developments create a dual challenge: intensifying downstream competition in electric vehicle (EV) markets and continued dependence on Chinese-controlled supply chains.
Crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. A Stress Test for Taiwan with Global Implications
The large-scale military operation carried out by the United States (US) and Israel against Iran triggered an Iranian retaliation that resulted in the partial destruction of natural gas liquefaction infrastructure and severe disruption of maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz. The economies of East Asia—South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan in particular—are highly exposed to this crisis due to their reliance on liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports for electricity generation.
Emmanuel Macron in Japan and South Korea: A Historic Opportunity for Euro-Asian Rapprochement
President Emmanuel Macron is touring Japan and South Korea at a time when the interests of these three countries have never been more aligned, and more broadly between Europe and East Asian democracies.
Afghanistan-Pakistan: The Overlooked War at the Margins of the Middle East Conflict
Pakistan has historically maintained the closest ties to the Taliban movement and initially viewed its return to power in Afghanistan in the summer of 2021 with considerable optimism. The bilateral relationship has since deteriorated, and the two neighbors have been caught in a cycle of escalation since last fall. In October 2025, Pakistan launched its first airstrikes on Kabul. For three weeks in February–March 2026, Afghanistan intensified ground assaults on the Pakistani side of the border as well as drone attacks on Islamabad and Rawalpindi. Pakistan, for its part, has intensified airstrikes on Afghan border areas, as well as on Kabul and Kandahar. Given the dynamics at play at the bilateral and regional levels, the prospects for a sustained return to stability appear limited.