Taking the Pulse: Has Political Deadlock in Member States Become a Strategic Problem for the EU?
At a pivotal moment for the EU, several of its member states are experiencing domestic political and economic crises. Is this hindering collective EU action in response to the challenges posed by Russia, China, and Trump’s administration?
Paul Maurice
Secretary general of the Study Committee on Franco-German Relations at the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri)
The possible change in the chancellorship from the Social Democratic Party’s Olaf Scholz to the Christian Democratic Union’s Friedrich Merz following the February 23 election in Germany could scale back the country’s defense commitments and military aid to Ukraine. Germany is also currently too preoccupied with its own internal problems to fully assume its traditional role as mediator between the United States and the EU. Meanwhile, France’s budgetary problems limit its ability to play a leading role in diplomatic negotiations or defense initiatives.
Add to this a few member states are being led by populist or far-right parties: Hungary, Italy, Slovakia, perhaps soon Austria... These situations create a leadership vacuum in key countries, complicating collective decisionmaking at EU level. European institutions such as the European Council, the commission, and the Polish presidency of the EU Council can play a stabilizing role, but they cannot fully compensate for the absence of national leadership.
The EU must also fix its economic competitiveness deficit, a crucial issue if it is to finance its ambitions in terms of defense and ecological transition. However, the internal divisions and divergent priorities of member states make it difficult to develop a coherent economic strategy in the face of China or the Trump’s United States, even if there is Franco-German convergence.
Aleksandra Kozioł
European security analyst at the Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM)
Giovanni Grevi
Senior fellow at the Centre for Security, Diplomacy and Strategy of the Brussels School of Governance (VUB)
Nora Müller
Executive director for International Affairs at the Körber-Stiftung
Anna Wieslander
Director for Northern Europe at the Atlantic Council
Jaanika Merilo
Visiting lecturer at the Estonian Academy of Security Sciences
Daniel Gros
Director of the Institute for European Policymaking at Bocconi University
Oana Lungescu
Distinguished fellow at the Royal United Services Institute
Judy Dempsey
Nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe
Ian Bond
Deputy director of the Centre for European Reform
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesFrance-Germany: Overcoming Differences to Strengthen European Sovereignty
The Franco-German “reset” launched with Friedrich Merz’s appointment as Chancellor in May 2025 and given concrete form at the Franco-German Council of Ministers (FGCM) in Toulon in August 2025 was intended to address the structural challenges affecting the bilateral relationship. Yet it is clear that these ambitions have only been partially translated into concrete action. Since the beginning of 2026, Franco-German relations have entered a phase in which short-term challenges have combined with deeper divergences over priorities, policy approaches, and strategic culture.
Under construction: Europe’s economic repositioning in a fragmented international order
„Under Destruction“– this was this year’s motto at the Munich Security Conference. A motto that applies both to security and economy in an increasingly fragile international system. In 2024, Mario Draghi’s report on the EU’s competitiveness rang the alarm bell: Europe is slipping behind the US and China, European companies struggle with Brussels' bureaucracy, and the internal market is too fragmented. However, two years later only about 15 % of his recommendations were implemented: the wake-up call was not heard.
Germany in the Shadow of the United States, Russia, and China – Systemic Paradigm Shifts
Since reunification, Germany has built its prosperity on an international order based on free trade, multilateralism, and geopolitical stability. This model relied on three relationships considered complementary: U.S. military protection, Russian energy supplies, and economic integration with China. For several decades, Berlin viewed these interdependencies as factors contributing to peace, growth, and security.
France and EU Enlargement: From Strategic Hesitation to a Geopolitical Shift
Paris has come a long way in its approach to enlarging the European Union. However, French support remains fragile, due in part to a lack of public support.