Deus ex machina : les enjeux de l’autonomisation des systèmes d’armes
While the automatization of machines is part of an already long historical, conceptual, and technical trajectory, the exponential progress of artificial intelligence techniques, robotics and their military applications suggest the emergence of systems that integrate more autonomy. Indeed, despite campaigns calling for a moratorium on autonomous weapons, most military powers are developing programs focused on autonomy.
A full-fledged autonomous arms race is emerging, dominated by the United States and China – mainly due to a large, technologically advanced civilian digital industry capable of irrigating the development of military applications. Russia is closely following these two giants, thanks to numerous projects that it does not hesitate to experiment on theaters of operations. The review of their military investments in research and development, their public declarations and their presentations in this field demonstrates the significant attraction of these countries for the autonomization of weapon systems.
The appeal of weapon system autonomization is such that it is sometimes seen as a sort of "deus ex machina", capable of remedying both the problems associated with the reduction in the size of armies and the reduced tolerance for human losses on the battlefield. However, this study seeks to demonstrate that the autonomization of weapon systems cannot be a miraculous solution capable of alleviating all the problems faced by the French armed forces. If there is a "deus ex machina", it is only because of the contributions of technology to emerging weapons systems. However, this technological progress does not fall from the sky: it is therefore necessary to remain pragmatic in order to prepare for the paradigm shift brought about by the rise of autonomous systems.
While real game changers such as drone swarms or Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS) could soon arrive on the battlefield, it is essential to consider the capability and strategic implications that these technologies will have for the French armed forces. In this respect, the military need encourages the fastest appropriation possible of the technological building blocks allowing the autonomization of certain functions of weapon systems. However, the development of weapon systems integrating autonomy and the acculturation to these technologies represent a major challenge. Let's take the god out of the machine, therefore, in order to shed light on the military uses of systems integrating autonomy, as well as their implications for the French armed forces.
This content is available in French: "Deus ex machina : les enjeux de l’autonomisation des systèmes d’armes".
Available in:
Regions and themes
Share
Laure de ROUCY-ROCHEGONDE
Director, Center for Geopolitics of Technology, Ifri
Security Studies Center
Heir to a tradition dating back to the founding of Ifri, the Security Studies Center provides public and private decision-makers as well as the general public with the keys to understanding power relations and contemporary modes of conflict as well as those to come. Through its positioning at the juncture of politics and operations, the credibility of its civil-military team and the wide distribution of its publications in French and English, the Center for Security Studies constitutes in the French landscape of think tanks a unique center of research and influence on the national and international defense debate.
Observatory on Future Conflicts
The Observatory of Future Conflicts is a research program carried out by the French Institute of International Relations and the Foundation for Strategic Research on behalf of the three army headquarters aimed at studying developments in tensions and armaments at the horizon 2040 in a transversal perspective, taking into account the issues of each army.
Framework Nation: A European Challenge and French Ambition
First appearing in the early 2000s, the framework nation concept follows several distinct rationales, whether it refers to a country assuming the leadership of a military operation, directing a multinational capability project, or commanding a permanent force structure. In every case, the country that takes on this role fully intends to derive from it additional politico-military influence.
The Nuanced Relationship Between Public Opinion and Foreign Policy
Public sentiment is something decision-makers must contend with, especially in democratic states. However, the extent to which public opinion shapes foreign policy varies. Three Council of Councils experts in France, India, and Nigeria reflect on how public opinion does—and sometimes does not—affect foreign policy decisions.
Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?
Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?
How does France’s nuclear deterrent contribute to the defense of Europe?
France’s nuclear deterrent, serving first and foremost to defend France’s vital interests, also contributes to the defense of Europe. This contribution has been recognized within the North Atlantic Alliance since 1974, but remains little known. In a speech closely followed by France’s European partners and its adversaries alike, President Emmanuel Macron announced a new concept for French nuclear deterrence: “forward deterrence” (dissuasion avancée). This article aims to explain the origins of this concept, outline its main pillars, and describe the partnerships that are sought. It then discusses the relationship with the U.S. doctrine of “extended deterrence”, and finally offers some ethical considerations.