The Future of Air Superiority. Command of the Air in High Intensity Warfare
Air superiority, understood as control of the air, is a cornerstone of the Western art of warfare. It is a decisive condition, albeit not sufficient by itself, to achieve military victory, as it enables the concentration of air power toward the achievement of wider strategic objectives and protects other components from unbearable attrition levels. It is best achieved through the offensive use of air power in a joint effort to neutralize the enemy’s air power.
The recent developments of Russian and Chinese air power challenge the West’s ability to acquire air superiority, particularly in the field of integrated air defense systems. The proliferation of ballistic and hypersonic technologies, drones, access to advanced electronic warfare technology, and the emerging exploitation of very high altitudes are potential game changers that might bypass or undermine the traditional Western paradigm of air dominance.
Radar stealth and the suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) are likely to remain the dominant factors of tactical superiority in air combat over the next decade. In addition, any force structure that will have switched from a platform-centric mindset to saturation and distribution strategies, while mastering a certain number of associated technologies, will gain a decisive edge in the battlespace.
The French air power is built around two main missions: nuclear deterrence and the air defense of mainland France. It is reaching the limits of its ability to weigh decisively within large coalitions fighting in high-intensity conflicts, due mostly to the absence of stealth platforms and SEAD capabilities, as well as to its undersized fleet of combat aircraft, lack of mission systems, and insufficient ammunition stockpiles.
This study lists several recommendations, broadly aiming at:
- maintaining the short- and medium-term relevance of the current fleet of combat aircraft by modernizing their mission systems and increasing weapons stockpiles;
- moving from a platform-centric approach to a network of distributed sensors and weapons working together to regain a form of mass;
- in the medium term, freeing fighter aviation from the Augustinian cost spiral, by ensuring the cost-effectiveness of its exquisite capabilities and employing them only where they are needed, while building a high-low mix of differentiated stand-in and standoff platforms.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
The Future of Air Superiority. Command of the Air in High Intensity Warfare
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesFury from the Skies. A Strategic Analysis of Air Campaign against Iran
What is the outcome of Operations Roaring Lion (RL) and Epic Fury (EF), launched by Israel and the United States against the Islamic Republic of Iran on February 28, 2026?
Finland: The Ally Who Came in from the Cold
Among all European countries, Finland is perhaps the one whose strategic culture and military model have changed the least since the end of the Cold War. Built after the end of the Second World War to deter a potential new Soviet invasion, this model enabled Finland to serve as an example of European rearmament.
Stability under Pressure. A Pakistani View on Nuclear Deterrence after Pahalgam
The May 2025 India-Pakistan crisis after the Pahalgam attack has generated a familiar but incomplete debate: did nuclear deterrence work, or did it merely allow both sides to fight a limited war under the nuclear shadow? The better answer is that deterrence worked at the level at which it was designed to work. It prevented a general war and an uncontrolled vertical escalation, and kept nuclear weapons in the background. But it did not prevent India from attempting to carve out space for conventional action, nor did it prevent Pakistan from responding conventionally to restore deterrence credibility.