France’s Place Within NATO: Toward a Strategic Aggiornamento?
With a rapidly deteriorating security environment, a chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, internal disputes exploding into public view, and questions being raised about the scope of its security responsibilities, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) seemed to be in dire straits at the time of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022.
The new Strategic Concept, agreed at the Madrid Summit in June 2022, is intended to act as a response to this major turning point and represents the culmination of a process of introspection following President Emmanuel Macron’s comment in an interview with The Economist describing the organization as “brain dead”. The Strategic Concept document sees the Alliance updating both its political and strategic goals. The repercussions of this aggiornamento for France’s defense policy and its armed forces tend to be somewhat underestimated by Paris.
Rather than examining the relationship between France and NATO, a subject already widely covered elsewhere, the aim of this study is to dissect the concrete aspects, primarily military but also political, that stem from this systemic shift within NATO and to analyze its potential consequences for the French defense apparatus. How should France handle these changes, and how can it take advantage of them? The central element of the 2022 Strategic Concept is the return of NATO to its primary function: the collective defense of member states on the eastern flank against its traditional rival, Russia, in respect of both conventional and nuclear threats. Without neglecting other aspects of the concept, it is therefore primarily in relation to the future “deterrence and defense (DDA)” posture, which will be denser and more responsive, that France needs to position itself. For the internal balances within NATO will be radically altered, in a European context where, despite significant disparities, defense budgets are on the rise again, and indeed accelerating in the case of Eastern European and Nordic countries. These financial and military contributions determine the level of responsibility, and therefore the political weight, attributed to each Ally.
What role can France play in this context? France has a great many military assets it can bring to bear within NATO: tried-and-tested armed forces, a responsive force structure, expertise in all fields of defense, and a capacity for strategic analysis of issues that extend beyond the Euro-Atlantic area. Its structural weight in the organization is also substantial, often placing it second only to the United States depending on the criteria used. However, France does not always seem to take optimal advantage of these levers of influence. It does not always succeed in building solid internal coalitions and lacks any established club of military affiliates.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
France’s Place Within NATO: Toward a Strategic Aggiornamento?
Author(s)
Guillaume GARNIER
Associate Research Fellow, Security Studies Center, Ifri
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programs
Security Studies Center
Heir to a tradition dating back to the founding of Ifri, the Security Studies Center provides public and private decision-makers as well as the general public with the keys to understanding power relations and contemporary modes of conflict as well as those to come. Through its positioning at the juncture of politics and operations, the credibility of its civil-military team and the wide distribution of its publications in French and English, the Center for Security Studies constitutes in the French landscape of think tanks a unique center of research and influence on the national and international defense debate.
European & Transatlantic Security
The European & Transatlantic Security Program aims to contribute to the strategic debate by developing analyses around three main axes: European defense and the security architecture of the European continent, institutional and strategic links between the Treaty Organization of North Atlantic (NATO) and the European Union (EU), as well as the evolution of the transatlantic relationship.
Defense Research Unit
The Defense Research Unit is a program that aims at stimulating the strategic debate by dealing with subjects at the junction of the “technico-operational” and the “political-strategic”. A unique structure in France, it brings together civilian researchers and “military fellows” from each of the three armies to produce work on defense policies, the capability and strategic adaptation of armies, and foresight on tomorrow's conflicts.
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
France has a new nuclear doctrine of ‘forward deterrence’ for Europe. What does it mean?
On Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron delivered a speech on France’s nuclear deterrence at the Île Longue naval base near Brest in Brittany, which hosts the country’s nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines. Such addresses are a well-established presidential ritual, typically delivered once per presidential term and receiving moderate attention. This one, however, was highly anticipated in France and abroad, given the profound geopolitical shifts since Macron’s first nuclear speech in February 2020.
Bundeswehr: From Zeitenwende (historic turning point) to Epochenbruch (epochal shift)
The Zeitenwende (historic turning point) announced by Olaf Scholz on February 27, 2022, is shifting into high gear. Financially supported by the March 2025 reform of Germany’s “debt break” and backed by a broad political and societal consensus to strengthen and modernize the Bundeswehr, Germany's military capabilities are set to rapidly increase over the coming years. Expected to assume a central role in the defense of the European continent in the context of changing transatlantic relations, Berlin’s military-political position on the continent is being radically transformed.
Main Battle Tank: Obsolescence or Renaissance?
Since February 2022, Russian and Ukrainian forces combined have lost more than 5,000 battle tanks, a much higher volume than all the European armor combined. Spearhead of the Soviet doctrine from which the two belligerents came, tanks were deployed in large numbers from the first day and proved to be a prime target for UAVs that became more numerous and efficient over the months. The large number of UAV strike videos against tanks has also led a certain number of observers to conclude, once again, that armor is obsolete on a modern battlefield. This approach must, however, be nuanced by a deeper study of the losses and their origin, UAVs rarely being the sole origin of the loss itself, often caused by a combination of factors such as mines, artillery or other anti-tank weapons.
Mapping the MilTech War: Eight Lessons from Ukraine’s Battlefield
This report maps out the evolution of key technologies that have emerged or developed in the last 4 years of the war in Ukraine. Its goal is to derive the lessons the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) could learn to strengthen its defensive capabilities and prepare for modern war, which is large-scale and conventional in nature.