The Crucial Challenge of Cyberthreats
In this special issue of Politique étrangère devoted to the proceedings of the conference organized by Ifri on April 10, 2019, in the Grand Amphitheater of the Sorbonne, on the occasion of its fortieth anniversary, discover the debate moderated by Marc Hecker between Thomas Gomart and Jean-Louis Gergorin.
Jean-Louis Gergorin
We are currently witnessing a strategic revolution that I would call a merger between Sun Tzu and Clausewitz, two of the greatest strategic thinkers, with the first one being the most famous in the West. Clausewitz said that war is the continuation of politics by other means, since war is an expression of violence in order to achieve the objectives of control, influence, etc. Sun Tzu simply wrote, 2,500 years ago: “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting”. This is consistent with what Professor Mahbubani said: the Chinese strategy is to win, to prevail by avoiding war. The Chinese have remained loyal to Sun Tzu.
Cyberwar is the fusion of two lines of thought, because it makes it possible to achieve the objectives of control and influence that Clausewitz described, in an attempt to continue politics through non-violent methods – in any event at the start, since, for example, if you cause an air disaster by blocking navigation systems, it becomes very violent. In any event, cyberwar for the most part can be non-violent, and achieve exactly the same control objectives as politics and war, and much more effectively.
What is cyberwar?
Another important thing is to know what we are talking about when we talk about “cyberwar” – and I know that this is not straightforward. Cyberwar is the offensive use of all digital options for control purposes, and this can be done in two major ways. The first is hacking for espionage, sabotage or intimidation purposes – and is currently the most common form.
“Cyberbullying”
We don't talk about “cyberbullying” a lot, but it's definitely important. I will give you three recent examples in chronological order. In May 2018, German cybersecurity officials reported a series of hacks in the energy and electrical systems, attempts that were seemingly foiled. There was no official attribution – that is the policy of BSI, the German cybersecurity agency – but the head of the State Office of the Protection of the Constitution accused Russia, and that has not been denied or confirmed. Second example: the United States' Department of Homeland Security published a well-substantiated report in July 2018 where it revealed that more than four hundred US electrical facilities – distribution and generation – had been subject to penetration without sabotage. The Americans also emphasized that their enemies could have committed sabotage, that they did not, but had shown that they could do it and could return. I am convinced that those who did this – the Americans have clearly attributed the operation to Russian military intelligence, the GRU – wanted to show that, in this period of tension and sanctions, they could act at the center of the US system. […]
Jean-Louis Gergorin, former Director of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ Policy Planning Staff (CAP) is co-author of Cyber: La guerre permanente, Paris, Cerf, 2018.
Thomas Gomart is Director of Ifri.
Marc Hecker is Ifri’s Director of Publications.
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
The Crucial Challenge of Cyberthreats
Author(s)
Thomas GOMART
Director of Ifri
Marc HECKER
Executive Director of Ifri, Editor-in-Chief of Politique étrangère, and Research Fellow at the Security Studies Center, Ifri
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
A New Path for Europe
The construction of the European Union is historically inseparable from the emergence, at the end of World War II, of an Atlantic world dominated by the United States. Successive enlargements and the revision of U.S. policy are undermining the concepts upon which the European Union has been built since the fall of the USSR. It is undoubtedly time to return to a path of more diverse groupings, corresponding to the levels of commitment and the interests of the states of the Old Continent.
How Technology Is Reshaping the World Order
The central role of technology in the competition between the major powers is fueling an ever-more intense rivalry. Artificial intelligence is enabling large corporations to accrue unprecedented power, with consequences for states and even for international conflict. However, states do have tools at their disposal to regulate these developments. In this international competition, Europe has a strong hand, but must be prepared to play its cards in order to create a new kind of international cooperation.
Reflections on A Darkening World
The system that emerged after the Second World War to regulate international relations is now moribund. Russia and China may have weakened it, but it seems that Donald Trump’s United States may deliver the fatal blow. The prevailing atmosphere is one of power struggles, and the rise of nationalisms is fraught with danger. The artificial intelligence revolution also needs to be factored into this equation, as it has a strong bearing on how much power different players can exert. In this respect, Europe must ensure it does not get left behind.
1936-2026: 90th Anniversary of the Journal "Politique étrangère"
Founded in 1936 and published by the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri), Politique étrangère, France’s longest-running journal of international relations, is set to publish a special issue in early June 2026. Bringing together distinguished French and international contributors, this issue aims to provide an overview of an uncertain world and its possible futures. In an unprecedented undertaking, Politique étrangère brings together a wide range of international contributions in an effort to grasp a global landscape that is at once open and fragmented, in all its diversity and dynamism. Through in-depth analyses of cross-cutting challenges, reflections on methods and structures of governance, and projections into futures feared or envisioned by creators from around the world—ranging from alternative histories to speculative thought experiments—the various approaches complement and challenge one another, opening up broad avenues for reflection.