Has ASEAN become Marginalized within Regional Security Architecture?
South Asian leaders continue to reiterate how “central” ASEAN is to the region’s security architecture. However, in practice, the tendency is to prioritize bilateral agreements, gradually marginalizing the organization. This fragmentation is weakening regional cooperation, accentuating divisions, and compromising stability in the context of growing tensions in the Indo-Pacific. These trends are worrying at a time when Sino-American rivalries are becoming more acute.
The global competition between China and the United States is particularly evident in Southeast Asia in the area of security. In this maritime and continental space located at the confluence of the Indian and Pacific Oceans, their competing strategies shape the regional environment in at least two ways. On the one hand, the actions of Beijing and Washington directly affect the sovereignty and security of coastal states, particularly in the South China Sea, where China is deploying a range of hybrid actions—occupation and reclamation of islets, harassment of fishermen and coast guards from other nations, cyberattacks and information operations—to which Washington responds by increasing freedom of navigation operations and other naval exercises. On the other hand, both China and the United States are investing in deepened security partnerships, which are vectors of their regional influence.
Faced with the effects of Sino-American rivalry, Southeast Asian states are in turn developing defense strategies and policies aimed at protecting themselves and promoting their interests, while at the same time prompting a redefinition of the regional security architecture (RSA). The latter can be broadly divided into three systems: bilateral and minilateral cooperation frameworks serving an operational purpose; partnerships with the United States, perceived by most neighboring countries as guarantors of regional stability and therefore deserving of special attention; and finally, a juxtaposition of multilateral forums organized around the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). These forums are designed as spaces for regional cooperation and socialization, intended to facilitate adherence to a set of norms, enable the emergence of common strategic perceptions and, above all, dilute the influence of extra-regional powers such as China, the United States, India and Japan within a broader group under the leadership of the association. [...]
Juliette Loesch is associate research fellow at Ifri's Center for Asian Studies.
This article is available only in French and has been published in Politique étrangère, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2025.
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Author(s)
Juliette LOESCH
Associate Research Fellow, Center for Asian Studies, Ifri
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
A New Path for Europe
The construction of the European Union is historically inseparable from the emergence, at the end of World War II, of an Atlantic world dominated by the United States. Successive enlargements and the revision of U.S. policy are undermining the concepts upon which the European Union has been built since the fall of the USSR. It is undoubtedly time to return to a path of more diverse groupings, corresponding to the levels of commitment and the interests of the states of the Old Continent.
How Technology Is Reshaping the World Order
The central role of technology in the competition between the major powers is fueling an ever-more intense rivalry. Artificial intelligence is enabling large corporations to accrue unprecedented power, with consequences for states and even for international conflict. However, states do have tools at their disposal to regulate these developments. In this international competition, Europe has a strong hand, but must be prepared to play its cards in order to create a new kind of international cooperation.
Reflections on A Darkening World
The system that emerged after the Second World War to regulate international relations is now moribund. Russia and China may have weakened it, but it seems that Donald Trump’s United States may deliver the fatal blow. The prevailing atmosphere is one of power struggles, and the rise of nationalisms is fraught with danger. The artificial intelligence revolution also needs to be factored into this equation, as it has a strong bearing on how much power different players can exert. In this respect, Europe must ensure it does not get left behind.
1936-2026: 90th Anniversary of the Journal "Politique étrangère"
Founded in 1936 and published by the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri), Politique étrangère, France’s longest-running journal of international relations, is set to publish a special issue in early June 2026. Bringing together leading contributors from France and abroad, this issue aims to offer a panorama of an uncertain world and its possible futures. In an unprecedented initiative, Politique étrangère will bring together a broad range of international contributions in an effort to capture an international scene that is at once open and fragmented in all its diversity and dynamism.