The New Diplomatic Weight of Gulf Countries
The political and economic weight of the Gulf monarchies has increased considerably. These countries have diversified their economies and become logistic hubs, attracting large numbers of investors. They have also managed to extend their power beyond their borders. However, the wider regional fallout of the war begun by Hamas on October 7, 2023 has cast doubt on the Gulf’s stability, especially as it seems that the American security umbrella can no longer be taken for granted
Over the past fifteen years, the Gulf monarchies have established themselves as major players, not only in the Middle East but more broadly on the international stage. Since the Arab Spring, they have become indispensable in most regional dynamics—from Egypt and Libya to Iraq and Syria—mobilizing their financial, energy, and diplomatic leverage to influence political developments in their regional environment. They are no longer limiting themselves to their immediate neighborhood: they are seeking to position themselves as global middle powers, capable of engaging in dialogue with Washington, Beijing, and Moscow, mediating in Ukraine and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and projecting themselves as pivots of a multipolar world order in the making.
This new stature is the result of a profound transformation in their foreign policy priorities as well as their internal governance. However, it is fragile and faces serious limitations: their ambition to make economic development and connectivity a vector for regional stability is hampered by the resurgence of armed conflicts in the Middle East. At a time when the regional balance of power is shifting, the Gulf countries are struggling to impose a long-term vision for the region that matches the regional leadership they claim to have.
Camille Lons is assistant director of the French office of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).
This article is available only in French and has been published in Politique étrangère, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2025.
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Author(s)
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
Has ASEAN become Marginalized within Regional Security Architecture?
South Asian leaders continue to reiterate how “central” ASEAN is to the region’s security architecture. However, in practice, the tendency is to prioritize bilateral agreements, gradually marginalizing the organization. This fragmentation is weakening regional cooperation, accentuating divisions, and compromising stability in the context of growing tensions in the Indo-Pacific. These trends are worrying at a time when Sino-American rivalries are becoming more acute.
Caught between China and the US: Southeast Asia’s Strategic Fence-Sitting
The secret of success for many Southeast Asian countries has been their choice of economic and diplomatic multilateralism. Fence-sitting between rival powers is becoming fraught. China inspires a degree of fear in the region, due to its clout and geographical proximity. And under Trump, the United States is on the offensive against the multilateral trade system, with major diplomatic consequences. Can Southeast Asian countries maintain their balance by embracing new partnerships?
The Gulf Search for Power(s) / Politique étrangère, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2025
Persian Gulf countries have become heavyweights in the international arena, wielding influence both regionally and far beyond. Acting as diplomatic mediators, investors, and hosts of global events, they are attempting to move beyond their long-standing role as suppliers of energy resources and reshape their economic, social, and political foundations through ambitious national “Visions”. Their international alliances are proving increasingly flexible, broadening their diplomatic reach (even if Washington’s influence remains decisive)—with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates all part of a dynamic pushing many global actors toward multi-alignment.
Trump II: The Clash of Ideologies
The second Trump administration brings together a number of very different, even opposing, ideologies: far-right populism, the reactionary Christian right, paleolibertarianism, and technolibertarianism. The most visible measures taken since Donald Trump's return to the White House have been populist in nature, with the president's authority strengthened, checks and balances weakened, a form of identity politics embraced, and economic nationalism implemented.