The New Diplomatic Weight of Gulf Countries
The political and economic weight of the Gulf monarchies has increased considerably. These countries have diversified their economies and become logistic hubs, attracting large numbers of investors. They have also managed to extend their power beyond their borders. However, the wider regional fallout of the war begun by Hamas on October 7, 2023 has cast doubt on the Gulf’s stability, especially as it seems that the American security umbrella can no longer be taken for granted
Over the past fifteen years, the Gulf monarchies have established themselves as major players, not only in the Middle East but more broadly on the international stage. Since the Arab Spring, they have become indispensable in most regional dynamics—from Egypt and Libya to Iraq and Syria—mobilizing their financial, energy, and diplomatic leverage to influence political developments in their regional environment. They are no longer limiting themselves to their immediate neighborhood: they are seeking to position themselves as global middle powers, capable of engaging in dialogue with Washington, Beijing, and Moscow, mediating in Ukraine and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and projecting themselves as pivots of a multipolar world order in the making.
This new stature is the result of a profound transformation in their foreign policy priorities as well as their internal governance. However, it is fragile and faces serious limitations: their ambition to make economic development and connectivity a vector for regional stability is hampered by the resurgence of armed conflicts in the Middle East. At a time when the regional balance of power is shifting, the Gulf countries are struggling to impose a long-term vision for the region that matches the regional leadership they claim to have.
Camille Lons is assistant director of the French office of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).
This article is available only in French and has been published in Politique étrangère, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2025.
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Iran: Anatomy of a Power at War
The elimination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and several high-ranking officials at the outset of the 2026 American-Israeli operation did not succeed in bringing down the Iranian regime. The regime had prepared for such a scenario, notably by decentralizing its structures. Moreover, it continues to adapt to war. The power of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is growing at the expense of the Shiite clergy. The security apparatus defends the country’s sovereignty and justifies its actions in the name of raison d’état.
“Remodeling” the Middle East?
Chaos continues to spread, seemingly without end, across the Middle East. The Israeli-American attack on Iran has resulted in a clear military and diplomatic failure, but it is paving the way for a regional realignment, the consequences of which remain uncertain. New regional groupings are taking shape, either centered around Israel or built on the prospect of coexistence with Tehran, alongside a decline in American influence and the marginalization of Europe, while China maintains a low-key presence.
Silicon Valley and War: Lessons from Ukraine
Over the course of international conflicts, and particularly in Ukraine, major tech companies have emerged as central actors. Initially subject to wartime maneuvering, they have since become decisive actors in their own right, privatizing a significant share of wartime exchanges, shaping the information flows of societies, and presenting themselves as providers of security. This situation raises important questions about states’ autonomy in making decisions and taking action.
Does Artificial Intelligence Change the Nature of War?
From Gaza to Ukraine and Iran, current conflicts are being shaped by the arrival of artificial intelligence and robots on the battlefield. The changes under way are so profound that humans risk rapidly losing control over entire aspects of the conduct of military operations. While these technological developments are altering the character of war, their impact on the very nature of war itself remains a matter of debate.