L’Iran et ses “proxys” au Moyen-Orient. Les défis de la guerre par procuration
If Iran is a key player in the Middle East, it is in no small part because of its extensive network of armed militia, which it uses as proxies.
This strategy is based on a political, material and sometimes operational support to non-state actors, some of which may have been created by Iran, while others are occasional partners. Since its creation in the 1980’s, the main architect of this strategy is the Quds force, whose task is to coordinate and support those militia’s actions. Moreover, some particularly advanced groups, such as the Lebanese Hezbollah or the Iraqi Badr organization, took an active role in the structuration of the Iranian paramilitary network in the Middle East. After meeting undeniable success in against the Syrian insurgency, in Iraq against the Islamic State, and even in Yemen against the Saudi-led intervention, the “Axis of Resistance” is now facing major challenges: the confrontation with the United States of Donald Trump, but also the threat of a growing political and social unrest, challenging the militia system, in Iran, as well as in countries where these networks are dominant, such as Iraq and Lebanon.
This content is only available in French: L’Iran et ses “proxys” au Moyen-Orient. Les défis de la guerre par procuration.
Available in:
Regions and themes
Share
Author(s)
Morgan PAGLIA
Former Research Fellow, Security Studies Center
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programs
Security Studies Center
Heir to a tradition dating back to the founding of Ifri, the Security Studies Center provides public and private decision-makers as well as the general public with the keys to understanding power relations and contemporary modes of conflict as well as those to come. Through its positioning at the juncture of politics and operations, the credibility of its civil-military team and the wide distribution of its publications in French and English, the Center for Security Studies constitutes in the French landscape of think tanks a unique center of research and influence on the national and international defense debate.
Observatory on Future Conflicts
The Observatory of Future Conflicts is a research program carried out by the French Institute of International Relations and the Foundation for Strategic Research on behalf of the three army headquarters aimed at studying developments in tensions and armaments at the horizon 2040 in a transversal perspective, taking into account the issues of each army.
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
Design, Destroy, Dominate. The Mass Drone Warfare as a Potential Military Revolution
The widespread use of drones observed in Ukraine—both in terms of the scale of the fleets deployed and their omnipresence in the operations of both belligerents—appears to meet the conditions of a genuine military revolution.
The Hunt for Economic Security: The Role of Navies in Deterring Threats to the Maritime Economy
The maritime domain is currently faced with a wide variety of threats, such as climate change, economic warfare, shadow fleet operations, protection of critical infrastructures, and illicit activities ranging from illegal fishing to piracy. Navies suffer from inherent limitations when deterring threats to the global maritime economy: their global presence and permanence limits their credibility in terms of deterrence, their focus usually set on immediate deterrence, implementing deterrence by punishment in and from the naval domain is difficult and costly.
A Fragile Consensus? The Pressure on the Norm Against Nuclear Testing
Apart from North Korea, no state has conducted explosive nuclear tests in the 21st century, reflecting the emergence of a strong international norm against such testing.
The Franco-German Brigade and the Revival of European Defense
One thing has been clear since Donald Trump's return to the White House: the very existence of the European unification project is threatened. Unless it develops a sovereign defense policy to counter the war in Ukraine and the weakening of American security guarantees, the European Union will continue to see its internal cohesion and external attractiveness wane.