Zeitenwende: The Bundeswehr’s Paradigm Shift
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, marked a turning point in German defense policy. After thirty years of military downsizing, the Bundeswehr found itself at an extremely low capability level just as a high-intensity war involving a great power was breaking out on Europe’s doorstep for the first time since 1945. Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s response was to embrace this “turning point” (Zeitenwende) by launching a major program to reequip Germany’s armed forces.
However, this change is part of a longer trend that started after the first wake-up call in 2014, following which Germany began tentatively to rebuild its military power. Under American pressure to share the defense burden, the new government that took office in 2021 included in its coalition agreement a national security strategy and an increase in defense spending. The war in Ukraine precipitated these decisions, combining the urgent need to provide arms with the more gradual pace of a long-term rearmament program.
In order to implement this rearmament plan, Olaf Scholz’s government set up a special fund (Sondervermögen) of €100 billion, financed by debt and dedicated entirely to the procurement of new materiel for the Bundeswehr. In addition to capability modernization, the Zeitenwende is founded on significant ambition within NATO. The North Atlantic Alliance remains the fundamental framework for the Bundeswehr, both on a conceptual and a doctrinal level. Finally, this multilateral integration is underpinned by a robust network of bilateral cooperations. The first and most important of these is undoubtedly with the United States; this relationship is carefully cultivated by Berlin despite the tensions caused by American frustrations with German shortcomings on defense issues.
All of these considerations bring us to an assessment of the implications of such a change for France, both in its partnership with Germany and at the European and transatlantic level.
Available in:
Regions and themes
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Zeitenwende: The Bundeswehr’s Paradigm Shift
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesHow does France’s nuclear deterrent contribute to the defense of Europe?
France’s nuclear deterrent, serving first and foremost to defend France’s vital interests, also contributes to the defense of Europe. This contribution has been recognized within the North Atlantic Alliance since 1974, but remains little known. In a speech closely followed by France’s European partners and its adversaries alike, President Emmanuel Macron announced a new concept for French nuclear deterrence: “forward deterrence” (dissuasion avancée). This article aims to explain the origins of this concept, outline its main pillars, and describe the partnerships that are sought. It then discusses the relationship with the U.S. doctrine of “extended deterrence”, and finally offers some ethical considerations.
Fury from the Skies. A Strategic Analysis of Air Campaign against Iran
What is the outcome of Operations Roaring Lion (RL) and Epic Fury (EF), launched by Israel and the United States against the Islamic Republic of Iran on February 28, 2026?
Finland: The Ally Who Came in from the Cold
Among all European countries, Finland is perhaps the one whose strategic culture and military model have changed the least since the end of the Cold War. Built after the end of the Second World War to deter a potential new Soviet invasion, this model enabled Finland to serve as an example of European rearmament.
Stability under Pressure. A Pakistani View on Nuclear Deterrence after Pahalgam
The May 2025 India-Pakistan crisis after the Pahalgam attack has generated a familiar but incomplete debate: did nuclear deterrence work, or did it merely allow both sides to fight a limited war under the nuclear shadow? The better answer is that deterrence worked at the level at which it was designed to work. It prevented a general war and an uncontrolled vertical escalation, and kept nuclear weapons in the background. But it did not prevent India from attempting to carve out space for conventional action, nor did it prevent Pakistan from responding conventionally to restore deterrence credibility.