Center for Geopolitics of Technology
Artificial intelligence (AI), 5G, cybersecurity, robotics, semiconductors, space…Technologies—particularly digital technologies—now profoundly affect all human activities and, by extension, international relations. The political, strategic, economic, and social stakes that arise from them are expressed across multiple political levels, involving states, international organizations, and private companies alike. International dynamics of competition and cooperation are being reshaped as a result. To address these challenges, Ifri launched its Geopolitics of Technology Center in 2020, offering a distinctly European perspective on the international issues surrounding so-called critical technologies.
Read more
Director, Center for Geopolitics of Technology, Ifri
Publications
See all our interventionsFlagship Publications
Titre Bloc Axe
Research Areas
See all our interventions
Titre Axe de recherche
European Technological Sovereignty
At a time when the global economy is being reshaped around critical technologies, the European Union is seeking to strengthen its capacity for autonomous action. This area explores European efforts to support innovation and competitiveness across the continent’s technology sectors, better manage external dependencies, enhance economic security, and ensure the resilience of value chains and infrastructures. It examines Europe’s vulnerabilities and strengths in the global technological competition—from cloud computing to semiconductors, from critical raw materials to green technologies—in order to identify the conditions for credible digital and industrial sovereignty.
Titre Axe de recherche
Sino-American Technological Rivalry
Control over critical technologies lies at the heart of a systemic rivalry between the United States and China, one that is redefining power relations and the rules of globalization. This area analyzes the industrial and innovation policies of the two major powers, their strategies of partial decoupling, and the growing weaponization of interdependencies. It also examines U.S. diplomatic efforts to rally allies around a shared vision of economic security, and China’s response.
Titre Axe de recherche
Emerging Technological Powers and New Partnerships
Competition among powers for control over digital infrastructures—submarine cables, data centers, telecommunications networks—is unfolding across emerging regions, including Africa, Latin America, and the Pacific. Beyond the U.S.–EU–China triangle, this area explores the national technology strategies of actors such as India, the Gulf countries, and “digital middle powers” (Brazil, South Korea, Kenya, the United Kingdom, etc.), balancing diversification of dependencies, digital regulation, and the race for innovation.
Titre Axe de recherche
Governance and Transnational Challenges
In the face of transnational challenges (energy transition, climate change, illicit trafficking, population aging) and the new risks posed by emerging technologies, how can these technologies be used and regulated in the service of the public good without falling into techno-solutionism? This area analyzes the political, geopolitical, legal, and ethical issues associated with technology governance (digital regulation, AI governance, competition over standards).
Titre Axe de recherche
The Civil–Military Dual-Use Nature of Technology
Since the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, we have witnessed a profound transformation in the relationship between major technology companies and the defense sector. This area studies the recent intensification of the dual-use nature of technologies (AI, but also quantum, robotics, etc.), the reconfiguration of sectoral balances that this entails, and the unprecedented dynamics between traditional defense industrial and technological base actors, Silicon Valley giants, and European start-ups.
Titre Axe de recherche
Space
Once the preserve of major powers, space is now seeing the entry of an increasing number of public and private actors. It has become a new arena of strategic, economic, and normative competition. Ifri’s space program aims to analyze the power dynamics, narratives, and governance instruments shaping the international space order, while examining the roles and strategies of state and private actors. By combining political, legal, and economic analysis, it seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the challenges of sovereignty, security, and cooperation in outer space.
Related research programs
The Team
Our research fellows: Center for Geopolitics of Technology
Publications
Health Data Governance: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Europe, China, and the United States
The health crisis has triggered a tectonic movement in the recomposition of health data governance and protection models around the world, while accelerating the investment of large digital companies in the field of e-health.
Europe in the Geopolitics of Technology: Connecting the Internal and External Dimensions
To respond to growing global competition, the EU has made notable progress on the internal dimension of technology policy over the past 3 years. It is now also seeking to adapt its foreign policy – from the transatlantic relationship to global partnerships – to technological challenges.
GovTech, The New Frontier in Digital Sovereignty
The COVID-19 crisis has been a catalyst for a surge in the GovTech market, while triggering debate around the use of new technologies in the public health response to the pandemic. More broadly, the health crisis has shed a new light on the strategic importance of some domains relevant to GovTech such as HealthTech, smart cities and EdTech.
Israeli Cyberpower: The Unfinished Development of the Start-up Nation?
Israel’s economic success in the cyber sector is undeniable. It is due to the development of an ecosystem encouraging the mastery of digital innovation.
5G and the US-China Tech Rivalry – a Test for Europe’s Future in the Digital Age
Assessing Europe's Space Dependency and Its Implications
It is a classic exercise to imagine what today’s world would be like if all satellites were shut down. The exact consequences of such a scenario, which is not unlikely given the inherent vulnerability of space systems to natural, accidental and deliberate interferences, are however difficult to appreciate, even for specialists.
Development of the Northern Sea Route: How great is the need for satellite observation?
The sea route between Europe and Asia is significantly shorter via Arctic waters than via the Suez Canal. Changes in global climate have resulted in a diminishing of ice in Arctic waters. This has resulted in the Northern Sea Route establishing itself as a viable commercial alternative, which is expected to expand in the years ahead. Satellite observation is one of the methods employed to gather information about ice conditions, weather and oil spills, and is a prerequisite for ensuring the continued development of the new traffic.
Support independent French research
Ifri, a foundation recognized as being of public utility, relies largely on private donors – companies and individuals – to guarantee its sustainability and intellectual independence. Through their funding, donors help maintain the Institute's position among the world's leading think tanks. By benefiting from an internationally recognized network and expertise, donors refine their understanding of geopolitical risk and its consequences on global politics and the economy. In 2025, Ifri supports more than 80 French and foreign companies and organizations.