Center for Geopolitics of Technology
Artificial intelligence (AI), 5G, cybersecurity, robotics, semiconductors, space…Technologies—particularly digital technologies—now profoundly affect all human activities and, by extension, international relations. The political, strategic, economic, and social stakes that arise from them are expressed across multiple political levels, involving states, international organizations, and private companies alike. International dynamics of competition and cooperation are being reshaped as a result. To address these challenges, Ifri launched its Geopolitics of Technology Center in 2020, offering a distinctly European perspective on the international issues surrounding so-called critical technologies.
Read more
Director, Center for Geopolitics of Technology, Ifri
Publications
See all our interventionsFlagship Publications
Titre Bloc Axe
Research Areas
See all our interventions
Titre Axe de recherche
European Technological Sovereignty
At a time when the global economy is being reshaped around critical technologies, the European Union is seeking to strengthen its capacity for autonomous action. This area explores European efforts to support innovation and competitiveness across the continent’s technology sectors, better manage external dependencies, enhance economic security, and ensure the resilience of value chains and infrastructures. It examines Europe’s vulnerabilities and strengths in the global technological competition—from cloud computing to semiconductors, from critical raw materials to green technologies—in order to identify the conditions for credible digital and industrial sovereignty.
Titre Axe de recherche
Sino-American Technological Rivalry
Control over critical technologies lies at the heart of a systemic rivalry between the United States and China, one that is redefining power relations and the rules of globalization. This area analyzes the industrial and innovation policies of the two major powers, their strategies of partial decoupling, and the growing weaponization of interdependencies. It also examines U.S. diplomatic efforts to rally allies around a shared vision of economic security, and China’s response.
Titre Axe de recherche
Emerging Technological Powers and New Partnerships
Competition among powers for control over digital infrastructures—submarine cables, data centers, telecommunications networks—is unfolding across emerging regions, including Africa, Latin America, and the Pacific. Beyond the U.S.–EU–China triangle, this area explores the national technology strategies of actors such as India, the Gulf countries, and “digital middle powers” (Brazil, South Korea, Kenya, the United Kingdom, etc.), balancing diversification of dependencies, digital regulation, and the race for innovation.
Titre Axe de recherche
Governance and Transnational Challenges
In the face of transnational challenges (energy transition, climate change, illicit trafficking, population aging) and the new risks posed by emerging technologies, how can these technologies be used and regulated in the service of the public good without falling into techno-solutionism? This area analyzes the political, geopolitical, legal, and ethical issues associated with technology governance (digital regulation, AI governance, competition over standards).
Titre Axe de recherche
The Civil–Military Dual-Use Nature of Technology
Since the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, we have witnessed a profound transformation in the relationship between major technology companies and the defense sector. This area studies the recent intensification of the dual-use nature of technologies (AI, but also quantum, robotics, etc.), the reconfiguration of sectoral balances that this entails, and the unprecedented dynamics between traditional defense industrial and technological base actors, Silicon Valley giants, and European start-ups.
Titre Axe de recherche
Space
Once the preserve of major powers, space is now seeing the entry of an increasing number of public and private actors. It has become a new arena of strategic, economic, and normative competition. Ifri’s space program aims to analyze the power dynamics, narratives, and governance instruments shaping the international space order, while examining the roles and strategies of state and private actors. By combining political, legal, and economic analysis, it seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the challenges of sovereignty, security, and cooperation in outer space.
Related research programs
The Team
Our research fellows: Center for Geopolitics of Technology
Publications
How to Curb Investments in Chinese Technology: Initiatives and Debates in the United States
In a continuation of U.S. efforts to slow China's development and acquisition of strategic technologies, Washington has imposed new restrictions on American investment in Chinese technology sectors such as artificial intelligence (AI), quantum, and semiconductors.
China in the Race to Low Earth Orbit: Perspectives on the Future Internet Constellation Guowang
In April 2021, the Chinese government officially, but rather quietly, established a new state-owned enterprise (SOE) named China SatNet. Its mission: build out China’s “mega-constellation” program for low Earth orbiting internet satellites, known as Guowang (“national network”).
The Technology Policies of Digital Middle Powers
Digital technology is an element of power in the international system as well as an area for competition among countries. The study provides a qualitative comparison of the technology policies of nine of the digital middle powers: Brazil, India, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Nigeria, Russia, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. It seeks to reflect the diversity of national technology policies, as well as to identify those countries’ convergences and divergences with Europe, the United States and China.
Digital Sovereignty: European Policies, American Dilemmas
European digital sovereignty has been made a priority by Ursula von der Leyen’s European Commission. Due to the privileged position of American companies in the European market, Brussels’ efforts towards digital sovereignty (on privacy, antitrust, data sovereignty, etc.) are closely scrutinized by American policymakers.
Software Power: The Economic and Geopolitical Implications of Open Source Software
Open source is at the heart of the Internet infrastructure, of the software used by individuals or governments, and of the innovation processes of tech companies. Faced with threats to the security and sustainability of the open source model, governments are getting a hold of the topic, which is becoming increasingly geopolitical.
Neither Surveillance nor Algorithm-driven Consumerism. Toward an Alternative European Model for Smart Cities
Numerous smart city projects are emerging, guided by objectives of efficiency and improvement of public policies. All of them are based on intensive use of data and digital tools, but their concrete achievements take various forms. Some models are being exported and are becoming levers of influence, while Europe is still looking for its own path.
Open Innovation in Defense. Passing Fad or New Philosophy?
The use of civilian technologies on the battlefield—one of the lessons that can be drawn from recent conflicts—is attracting growing interest from the armed forces of France and other nations. The growing number of examples of effective integration of civilian technologies into the armed forces, including during conflict, shows the importance of open innovation and the acceleration of the international race toward innovation in the defense industry.
“Open” Telecom Networks (Open RAN): Towards a Reconfiguration of International Competition in 5G?
In line with the anti-Huawei diplomatic campaign of the Trump and Biden administrations, the United States has promoted an alternative: Open RAN, a concept defined by "open" network architectures. At the intersection of 5G geopolitics and standards, what risks and opportunities does Open RAN present for European technological sovereignty?
Critical technologies and industrial capabilities: National definitions and implications. The French case.
France has historically paid significant attention to strategic technologies and industries, whether they were strictly defence- and nuclear deterrence related, or considered as vectors of national independence and security, more broadly.
Fishing for Chips: Assessing the EU Chips Act
China, the United States, and the European Union (EU) are currently developing strategies for semiconductors aimed at financing R&D and the installation of new factories on their territories, in particular through subsidies. The EU Chips Act, announced in February 2022, represents a real break in Europe's industrial policy.
Support independent French research
Ifri, a foundation recognized as being of public utility, relies largely on private donors – companies and individuals – to guarantee its sustainability and intellectual independence. Through their funding, donors help maintain the Institute's position among the world's leading think tanks. By benefiting from an internationally recognized network and expertise, donors refine their understanding of geopolitical risk and its consequences on global politics and the economy. In 2025, Ifri supports more than 80 French and foreign companies and organizations.